



 
			
			
				They just seem to have like a quite limited budget when it comes to gear. We can correlate since the limited races were added, and even before, a decline in quality.I don’t think many are arguing against them being reused, so much as they’re reused AND STILL UNDYABLE. Like there is no excuse for this other than laziness. It’s like when they released shire gear for a 3rd time in Anamnesis and didn’t even bother to role swap it or anything.
WHM | RDM | DNC
 
			
			
				Every time a new race / gender is added, that's a new model that needs to be fitted for all the gear. ALL OF IT.
People wanted genders removed from certain pieces. Guess what work had to be done.
Guess why it's going to be a while before lionesses come out.




 
			
			
				People want a lot of things, but if the budget is really as limited as it is (for one, it should be expanded), then maybe they should manage it a bit better. The limited races, I am convinced, have become a great hindrance to the game. Like, sorry to hrothgar players, and I like viera myself, but they weren't done right and the overall quality is suffering as a result. No, limited races aren't the singular cause, of course not, but if they didn't have to fit everything to hrothgar and viera, maybe they could have focused on giving us more things across the board. Including more hairs and customization for everyone.
Last edited by SturmChurro; 06-14-2022 at 05:51 AM.
WHM | RDM | DNC
 
			
			
				Are you unironically saying less options is better and fine lol. Please tell me you aren’t.There's nothing wrong with consistency in role gear. It sounds like they want to maintain some identity between them.
I see nothing wrong with anything related to Ascians being undyable. That's how they were presented. Not everything needs the option to be dyed especially if it's gonna be dyed in some heinous fashion
 
			
			
				I wouldn't even bother lol, they have consistently defended SE's ridiculous actions, no matter how inefficient/lazy/terrible/ect it is because they like it, so obviously everything's fine and nothing's wrong. Or the good old "you try developing it yourself then!".
 
			
			
				Eh. There's a big difference between defending and explaining. There really is only so much that can be done.
But oh, how you love to complain. Life isn't complete without complaints and no thought of feasible solutions. To be in a constant state of butthurt...
 
			
			
				Sure buddy, I'd love to see what "feasible" solutions you came up with in this thread. Unless I missed something, I mostly just saw "there's nothing wrong with the way they're doing things."
Which, all the power to you if you think that way. But to dismiss it as simple complaints is just straight insufferable.
 
			
			
				The complaints are what's insufferable. You can't even point to a game that has achieved the level of perfection you're seeking out. You're asking the impossible and making claims about a company when you really have no clue what's really going on there. Show me where this precedent has been set and I'll accept this as more than just idle complaints. This is not any kind of defense, just straight facts and you can't accept them.Sure buddy, I'd love to see what "feasible" solutions you came up with in this thread. Unless I missed something, I mostly just saw "there's nothing wrong with the way they're doing things."
Which, all the power to you if you think that way. But to dismiss it as simple complaints is just straight insufferable.
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
 Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami
 Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami
					
 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote