Quote Originally Posted by Flaws View Post
What's stopping you from looking the part if you only have more freedom to put on anything you want and not less? Who's to say that you can't look the part with some pieces from other roles's gear which would objectively make your glamour look even more the part than without having that freedom? I fail to understand why people still try to push this role/job identity idea as an excuse when it's been thrown out the window several expansions ago.
It's never been thrown out the window. Like ever. If it was thrown out the window, we wouldn't even be having this discussion now would we? What you mean to say is you want it thrown out the window. You believe that just because playful glamours are released, it defeats all purpose to continue to have restrictions on the glamour system. Players who are against lifting restrictions, or have an idea why they are in place have listed reasons from north to south. They cannot be faulted when those who want the restrictions to go away mulch their statements into reasonings based on identity to be easily ignored.

Quote Originally Posted by Flaws View Post
The ONLY gear that should MAYBE be exempt from this is AF gear which was specifically designed for ONE job with actual JOB identity in mind.
The dev team doesn't need to be told what gear should and shouldn't have restrictions. This is totally up to them, and they can place those restrictions for any reason they deem fit. Many of the players who are for the restrictions are glamour chasers as well. They can and do have overlapping limitations and frustrations. This doesn't change their views though because they know and understand that the devs don't ever place restrictions on gear to purposely grieve them and/or deliberately limit their glamour pool.