Quote Originally Posted by RyuDragnier View Post
I hate to bring up old threads better left dead (due to the arguments, this one in context being about Venat), but you said in this quote long ago:



By that very standard, doesn't that make the EE fallible simply BECAUSE Dynamis isn't well known yet?
Yes, I wasn't saying that the Encyclopedia Eorzea was infallible.

What I was saying is that we have no actual evidence that says we should throw away this information and just go 'BUT DYNAMIS', especially because Endwalker itself provided explicitly clear examples of non-dynamis LBs that actually support those descriptions. There's no counterevidence that suggests that these LB descriptions aren't accurate, so we have no reason to believe they aren't.


Again: There's descriptions of abilities in the Encyclopedia that genuinely do sound like they might be dynamis-related, and are worthy of discussion on that front; I'd point out Manawall and Unleash. We should talk about them, instead of just going 'the NIN LB3 is dynamis because I think that's cool and don't care that it's got a direct explanation'.