If you don't like being target for violating TOS...how about don't violate the TOS?

[Shurrikhan]

So many people decided to pick through my posts through a lens of me saying don't put a parser in the game. Y'all are WAY to trigger happy. I did NOT say that. I said if you do put it in the game I want to be able to opt entirely out of it. I don't see my parses and neither does anyone else.

As I have already said I KNOW how the optimal rotations and gearing come to be. Let me refer to the above paragraph and say again I did NOT say don't put a parser in the game. Just that if it is I want to opt entirely out of it with no one seeing my parses.

I did misunderstand your take originally and have since edited my response. My apologies for the initial misconstruction of your arguments.

Edit: Also needed to correct a typo.

[Myrany]

I did misunderstand your take originally and have since edited my response. My apologies for the initial misconstruction of your arguments.

Edit: Also needed to correct a typo.

TY I really appreciate that.

[Shurrikhan]

TY I really appreciate that.

You're most welcome. I'm sorry for my part in letting things get heated enough that reading comprehension might melt in the process.

In my case, I'd run into a few people who seemed to be projecting their own, rather extreme uses of a given tool or medium onto everyone to assume that what options (or lack thereof) would work best for them would also work best for all.
I still don't know how I missed originally that you were insisting only on not taking away options in either direction. I swear I normally have at least a few more braincells at work.

Hopefully letting things chill at least once per 3-to-10 pages may help things out.