If you don't like being target for violating TOS...how about don't violate the TOS?

[Shurrikhan]

If it wasn't you - it wasn't. I'm not entirely inclined to believe you. But you know what - whatever. I don't ever report anyway so this boils down to just in-forum drama.

We'll agree to disagree and move on.

To be honest, there are so many shit-stirrers just popcorn munching to these threads that a great many people could have taken that opportunity to make a character and add a bit fecal matter to the community pot; it seems pretty reasonable that Nav wouldn't, as she said, ignore a rule that actually protects people from harm just to call someone out by way of a rule that doesn't (and, at this appoint, appears to mildly encourage it).

What more is there to say? I've been called a Karen, a crazy Granny and mentally ill. I am not sure what more I can add to the conversation when everything will be responded to with pure vitriol. However, it does prove my point. Most of you are so valiantly defending breaking TOS because you most like are yourself and feel the need to justify it.

Okay, at this point I have to believe you're just baiting. I could see someone being irritable in a given moment, if something had already been happening irl to flag their attention in a that direction, to mistake "clues me in to your mentality" (which referred to your seeming, in prior comments, entitled and intolerable of even the most constructive criticism -- nothing at all to do with being mentally ill) as a comment about your mental health. But that misconception was already corrected/clarified... how many times now?

You're brandishing your own misconception, which was an unreasonable stretch to begin with, like a bludgeon by which to accuse others of abuse (nevermind that your conflating the two qualities tacitly calls any defensive person mentally ill) despite all clarification to its contrary, and yet you're somehow still assuming a pure victim narrative?