Why not a warning?

[MellowMink]

I assume it’s because if there was just a warning without a punishment, then other people who use mods that provide gameplay or HUD advantages (not cosmetic tweaks that don’t affect the gameplay like adding missing Hrothgar hat support, which I hope Square Enix would focus on) would just keep doing it until they hit that harmless warning; this sends a stronger message. That said, ten days does feel kind of high for an initial punishment.

[Raoabolic]

not cosmetic tweaks that don’t affect the gameplay like adding missing Hrothgar hat support, which I hope Square Enix would focus on

*Awkwardly stares at the temp ban that one player got because people mass reported their nsfw pictures from twitter to SE*

[MellowMink]

*Awkwardly stares at the temp ban that one player got because people mass reported their nsfw pictures from twitter to SE*

To be fair, that’s different because everyone in PvP has to see someone’s adventurer plate that’s been made to look like… something that rhymes with procrastination; people can’t choose to opt out of NC-17 material like that. Hrothgar hat fixes are neither lewd nor even seen by everyone.

[Raoabolic]

To be fair, that’s different because everyone in PvP has to see someone’s adventurer plate that’s been made to look like… something that rhymes with procrastination; people can’t choose to opt out of NC-17 material like that. Hrothgar hat fixes are neither lewd nor even seen by everyone.

Nah, the Adventure plate thing was legit since it showed the pictures before each match. This was a year or two ago when someone used texture mods to make nsfw pictures. They showed it off on Twitter and some people mass reported that person for hacking. The weird thing was that before they said that they won't use outside evidence (twitter, instagram, youtube, twitch, ect.) as evidence for hacking but I guess they changed their mind. Oh well, lol.