...You can't have Glamour Dresser in your house? Are you for real? LOL.
...You can't have Glamour Dresser in your house? Are you for real? LOL.
100%
This would be such a QoL improvement and convenience. Would give me more reason to hang out in my apartment.
As Midareyukki said. You can have a mailbox, and a FC chest. And a retainer bell, fuck you can even put the retainer outside with a permit and sell stuff directly, and mannequins, but no glamour chest or item.Hi there everyone , so i have some time in game , and after all this i got an apartment in my FC house , some furnishing and all , so wanted my galmour dresser as well ....Seemed logical to me that i can buy one since its such an important part in game , applying glamours and so on , but ...did you know YOU CAN'T BUY ONE FOR YOUR OWN HOUSE .... Like how does that make sense , have to go back to an Inn or the GC squadron to do glam...like ..why ... So if you think the same give a hand we might get our wish come true
While late to this thread, I've also have a warlock, shaman, warrior, DK, rogue etc transmogs that are quite unique since vanilla wow. Zero is correct in that statement belittling it does not make it wrong. If moving it while someone is using is a issue simply make it a perm fixture when you get a apartment/room, If its too many opening on server as was stated in previous posts and can only be stable in a instanced area......Aren't FC rooms and apartments instanced?
Last edited by Todesmaus; 12-25-2022 at 07:29 AM.
Why not just restrict it so that only people in the apartment, house, or free company that have the appropriate privileges can use them. Then further restrict it so that when someone uses a glamour dresser, IT WILL NOT WORK while a house is in editing mode. The item would basically become completely useless unless completely out of editing mode in housing.
What happens if someone opens it before another person opens editing mode? You likely run into the same problem.Why not just restrict it so that only people in the apartment, house, or free company that have the appropriate privileges can use them. Then further restrict it so that when someone uses a glamour dresser, IT WILL NOT WORK while a house is in editing mode. The item would basically become completely useless unless completely out of editing mode in housing.
I think the best option is probably to make them exist only I rooms and apartments, limiting who can use them to the owner of that room. Less lucrative perhaps, but sidesteps the inherited 1.0 issues
Then make it so that it kicks them out of the glamour dresser when someone tries to do that. That way there isn't a crash, or it could even say "can't edit house, wait until someone is using the glamour dresser".What happens if someone opens it before another person opens editing mode? You likely run into the same problem.
I think the best option is probably to make them exist only I rooms and apartments, limiting who can use them to the owner of that room. Less lucrative perhaps, but sidesteps the inherited 1.0 issues
There's no easy solution for this, so it will have to be a bit more complicated.
That assumes kicking them out of the dresser isn't what's causing the crazh.Then make it so that it kicks them out of the glamour dresser when someone tries to do that. That way there isn't a crash, or it could even say "can't edit house, wait until someone is using the glamour dresser".
There's no easy solution for this, so it will have to be a bit more complicated.
And they can fix the crashing issue why? Seems like they don't want to![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.