You are overriding all the marks fpr priority by swapping between targets.
You are overriding all the marks fpr priority by swapping between targets.
Counterpoint: please continue to mark your burst targets so I can tell when hard CC is going out. "Priority" is constantly shifting based on enemy resources and positioning, and the best target will almost always be the target who you have the best chance to kill or force off the point.
counterpoint: if priority shift, u can still attack what ever u think is the priority without moving markers. Deleting the rest of markers to mark a top 1 is countering your team.Counterpoint: please continue to mark your burst targets so I can tell when hard CC is going out. "Priority" is constantly shifting based on enemy resources and positioning, and the best target will almost always be the target who you have the best chance to kill or force off the point.
As far as the 5 enemies are alive, shifting priorities is not going to happen that much, and you are going to delete the 1,2,3 markers just to leave a 1 marker and when 1 is not in range for the rest of your team, they will not be able to focus a single target.
Not to mention 2 idiots with the same macro changing the marker every second, stop.
And u leave the rest of the team with no target when is split for X reason or 2 guys with the same macro don't stop changing the target. Just stop, you are no leader, noone is. Just put 1,2,3 marks at the start and stick to them, attack the lowest number possible that is not Guard'ed. I already lost several games with 2 guys deciding their target is the most important.
Last edited by Raistlin; 04-27-2022 at 08:00 AM.
I think you can do better than that. Almost all of my most drastic stomps have been because of a tank or melee aggressively calling a new target every few seconds, often with countdown macros to avoid giving the target away early. Unpredictable bursts on unpredictable targets strain the support roles, put people under quick pressure to use their defensive stuff, and force people away from the objective for easier followup bursts.And u leave the rest of the team with no target when is split for X reason or 2 guys with the same macro don't stop changing the target. Just stop, you are no leader, noone is. Just put 1,2,3 marks at the start and stick to them, attack the lowest number possible that is not Guard'ed. I already lost several games with 2 guys deciding their target is the most important.
Putting all your GCDs consistently into the same person/people lets the rest of the enemy team run wild, and wastes opportunities to punish aggressive pushes or mistakes. Coordinating burst with hard CC, on the player who's currently most vulnerable, is the only way to reliably kill anyone—strict target priority hurts a team IMO.
^ this person gets it.
Gotta add to the pile here and say this is blatantly false. If you're not shifting priorities/targets based on the factors around you then you're not playing it right. You can't just keep wailing on one dude the entire time until they're dead. My partner who is a much more experienced vet in pvp games (I don't usually play them cuz I get super invested/kinda toxic sometimes and I'm working on that) like Overwatch and stuff explained to me as "pick the person who is currently killable."
Killable relies on a few different factors:Even if you base your initial markers on Class and/or skill level present after the first engagement, you're going to have scenarios where LB + Life + Positioning + Team Comp will influence what target is killable when. I don't need to focus on the WHM if I can kill their SAM/NIN friends right now. I don't need to focus on a RDM if their WAR is about to go down leaving them defenseless.1. Purify use
2. HP remaining
3. MP remaining
4. Position in relation to the rest of their/your team
5. Pressure they're currently applying to your team if unchecked (this one's a bit iffy)
Shifting targets is essential to securing kills. That WHM (despite its kit) can't 1v5 you, and that WAR can't really stand up to 5 people bursting them at once either. By shifting top priority consistently it doesn't matter what 2-5 are, because your team is moving consistently together to coordinate attacks.
Did you help them kill the target they were calling out? Because if not, that might be part of why you lost, lol
Last edited by Tobias_Azuryon; 04-27-2022 at 10:36 PM.
What are you talking about? I mean 2 idiots, with your macros to mark Attack1 to whatever they are attacking, one attacking the RDM, the other the Healer and swapping the Mark because THEIR opinion of who we should attack is the important, the other 3 did not know what to focus.
STOP.
Last edited by Raistlin; 04-28-2022 at 12:54 AM.
This is bad when happens. Imho only one person should lead the team. Usually i do because no ones do call outs, but if i see someone else mark someone i just follow those marks to avoid confusion during the match and let them lead.What are you talking about? I mean 2 idiots, with your macros to mark Attack1 to whatever they are attacking, one attacking the RDM, the other the Healer and swapping the Mark because THEIR opinion of who we should attack is the important, the other 3 did not know what to focus.
STOP.
This. Static priority marks are pointless in CC.Counterpoint: please continue to mark your burst targets so I can tell when hard CC is going out. "Priority" is constantly shifting based on enemy resources and positioning, and the best target will almost always be the target who you have the best chance to kill or force off the point.
The team should be switching targets dynamically based on enemy positioning and ability usage.
There's virtually zero value in identifying the order in which you'd ideally kill the enemy team as if it's a PvE encounter.
Marks like that are clutter at best and confusing at worst.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.