If someone's really going to come in here and think that one guy is somehow representative of the issue at hand, they were probably never going to be amenable to what anyone had said in the previous 64 pages no matter how much sense we try to make.

Lately, at the time of this particular post, there's been a lot of talk about toxic positivity and toxic negativity, and how people's feedback is really not helpful or worth anything, and we've gotten some of that trickling into this thread. Ultimately, I just hope that, when and if people do read through this thread, whether it's the first post, the last post, or any and all of the posts in-between, that they take a moment and reflect on why people try to present their issues in any capacity and how it is important for even the layman to provide their thoughts on a subject they might want to improve, no matter how comprehensive or emotional they may be if they were to enter the conversation.

With regards to this particular thread, I don't know that the devs will ever be willing to acknowledge that there are improvements to be made, but I also think it's important to continue to let these grievances be publicly known, as this isn't an issue that's as isolated as other users are wanting to make out of it. As some of the underlying issues continue to spread to the rest of the jobs' redesigns and "updates," it's best to keep up the feedback so that there's at least a chance we can turn things around.