Healers need an overhaul

[Raven2014]

Waiting years for some sort of growth, when healers have been starved to death for since SB (or even sooner depending on who you ask) does not leave room for much hope.

Exactly, depend on who you ask. And if you ask me, then I think healers have been growing, and I'm generally fine with things. It maybe hard due to the constant complains on here, but there exist people like me who the only reason we play healer for the last 8-10 years is because we "actually" like it. One of the biggest "milestone" in healer design is that they finally make the DPS and Healing channels neutral from one another (with SCH the very last straggler with Energy drain). There is no way I have been unsatisfy with healer for that long, because I would have left the job the moment I stop enjoying it.


Like I said, I think the role "does" hit a wall now, but it looks like the developers had recognize the right mindset for it, so I don't mind a hard reset and take it from there.

[Eisi]

One of the biggest "milestone" in healer design is that they finally make the DPS and Healing channels neutral from one another (with SCH the very last straggler with Energy drain).

Open your third eye brother!

The following spells are all in the same channel as your basic DPS GCDs -the GCD- and are a DPS loss whenever cast unless every single other resource is already spent and you would let someone die 100%:

-Cure
-Cure II
-Cure III
-Medica
-Medica II
-Regen
-Physick
-Adloquium
-Succor
-Benefic
-Benefic II
-Aspected Benefic
-Helios
-Aspected Helios
-Diagnosis and Eukrasian Diagnosis
-Prognosis and Eukrasian Prognosis


There are three damage neutral abilities in the GCD channel that heal at the same time (excluding Kardia heals):

-Afflatus Solace and Afflatus Rapture (both require a lily, a limited resource)
-Pneuma

These are the only spells for which your statement holds true. If you see an issue with Energy Drain for sharing a resource with healing abilities, you must take issue with this as well!

Keep the GCD rolling!

[Payadopa]

So they've delayed an AST overhaul until 7.0 because of "extensive changes" needing a new expansion and not just a patch or something.
Is there any chance that this could portend an eventual overhaul of the healing role?

As much as I'd want to I can't see that happening. If one changes so should the other three and yet only AST (my main) is supposed to be overhauled.

At this point I'm more concerned than anything.

[Semirhage]

So they've delayed an AST overhaul until 7.0 because of "extensive changes" needing a new expansion and not just a patch or something.
Is there any chance that this could portend an eventual overhaul of the healing role?

I'd doubt very much. In the healer award show, you could argue down the floor over who wins the Razzie for least engaging; AST is the only one I wouldn't put in the running. With that in mind, if Square has announced an overhaul and has named the Not-Most-Boring one as the target for the makeover? I'd bet money the procedure is a flogging instead of a spa treatment.

[Raven2014]

These are the only spells for which your statement holds true. If you see an issue with Energy Drain for sharing a resource with healing abilities, you must take issue with this as well!

Keep the GCD rolling!

No, what you said is right if we're talking on "paper". What I'm talking is right when taken into the realistic context. Currently you have enough oGCD that most of the time you don't need GCD heal and thus incure a DPS loss. If you make a heal a DPS gain, than people just use it on cool down as a DPS ability and not a heal. Make it a DPS loss and people just refuse to use it. The fact they made Lily DPS neutral, Macrocosmos and Pneuma are the 2 biggest heal also a DPS neutral, is like I said an important milestone in the design mindset

Also I have a feeling you're missing the point, the reason I said it's a milestone is because it's only now we reach this point, the majority of the healers toolkit are still legacy carried over from 10 years of development. If anything, your post just re-enforce my point about the healers job may go through a complete revamp like SMN did.

[Kaliesto]

I feel kind of bad for Sages, their healing & Combat set is just all over the place.

[Silver-Strider]

No, what you said is right if we're talking on "paper". What I'm talking is right when taken into the realistic context. Currently you have enough oGCD that most of the time you don't need GCD heal and thus incure a DPS loss. If you make a heal a DPS gain, than people just use it on cool down as a DPS ability and not a heal. Make it a DPS loss and people just refuse to use it. The fact they made Lily DPS neutral, Macrocosmos and Pneuma are the 2 biggest heal also a DPS neutral, is like I said an important milestone in the design mindset

Also I have a feeling you're missing the point, the reason I said it's a milestone is because it's only now we reach this point, the majority of the healers toolkit are still legacy carried over from 10 years of development. If anything, your post just re-enforce my point about the healers job may go through a complete revamp like SMN did.

If it took them 10 years to notice that healers have GCDs that are DPS negative, that doesn't exactly instill a lot of confidence that Healer adjustments are coming any time soon, despite the fact that we've been providing detailed feedback in regards to those problem for almost as long as they've existed.

[Sebazy]

The fact they made Lily DPS neutral, Macrocosmos and Pneuma are the 2 biggest heal also a DPS neutral, is like I said an important milestone in the design mindset

It's a solid point. Hopefully they noticed the positivity towards the 6.1 Lily tweaks and have learned a lesson in design from that feedback. The last caveat is of course the concern that if healers will get allocated sufficient dev time in the oven for them to do a reasonable job of it without us getting another incomplete mess on expansion day.

[Eisi]

No, what you said is right if we're talking on "paper". What I'm talking is right when taken into the realistic context. Currently you have enough oGCD that most of the time you don't need GCD heal and thus incure a DPS loss.

I can't even say you're wrong, because I don't understand what you mean. Do you view spells that are rather meaningless in a realistic context as nonproblematic and inoffensive as opposed to Energy Drain which more frequently confronts you with the same choice?

They are not. They clutter the spellbook with so much boring and highly situational bs that gets introduced at lower levels as your basic healing toolset to get basically completely dumpstered at a later point because of them being DPS-negative, not only unneccessarily confusing players but taking up a significant chunk of buttons that would be needed for actually useful, interesting and fun abilities. Viable healing GCD options no less!

Also I have a feeling you're missing the point, the reason I said it's a milestone is because it's only now we reach this point, the majority of the healers toolkit are still legacy carried over from 10 years of development.

This milestone was reached by Shadowbringers, I assume Pneuma and Macrocosm are hysterically cautious steps in the same direction as the lily heals, we will probably get another spell in the same vein in the next expansion at this rate.

If anything, your post just re-enforce my point about the healers job may go through a complete revamp like SMN did.

Well I hope you're right, they should!

[LeonKeyh]

I feel kind of bad for Sages, their healing & Combat set is just all over the place.

Really? Sage is my favorite healer. While I feel like their sets could be a bit more interesting, I'm not sure I understand why Sage would be singled out as the job with stuff "all over the place."