Housing Rant

[Corvus_V]

We can complain about what other players do all we want but as long as they are playing within the rules of the game, they are doing nothing wrong. It's on SE to fix and enforce their rules.

I agree, that's why I said theoretically they should have the functionality in place to just remove ownership of the houses of hoarders. If you aren't meant to buy that many on a single service account, you aren't meant to circumvent that by buying multiple service accounts to get around that. I don't really see how it is totally different than ban dodging; but I think the fact of the matter is that it's uncommon; something that should nonetheless be dealt with on a case-by-case basis because of that. Just like, theoretically, not removing the relocation system entirely because a few unfortunate souls were trolled by someone who made it their personal mission to relocate to any plot someone was trying to own deliberately. Both of them would be/are a bad change, but saying "well they paid for it" isn't really great, because a lot of people can pay for a lot of things. like RMT. People would probably, again, care a lot less if they could simply own a house via instanced housing, then they'd just have pissed off venue owners to contend with. I personally doubt the kind of gil necessary to do that sort of thing would come without botting, either; but thats just a guess based on how often I see bots from multiboxers gathering 24/7 who have gone unpunished since at least Shadowbringer's release. I've even seen coordinated bot parties clearing maps. I know MMOs can't be perfect, but to seeing them get banned exclusively in waves while stuff like that happens doesn't exactly inspire confidence that they aren't directly connected.

Like there also isn't a totally accurate way to effectively automate preventing people from making new accounts and doing this. You couldn't do it via IP, and even then there's ways to get around that. Payment methods wouldn't work, it's a really circumventable problem not worth thinking about outside of having a GM handle it. In general, a lot of player to player problems should just be handled by GMs. I don't know why SE has such a hands off approach on people who make it their objective to break stuff and piss everyone off. They wouldn't even have to deal with them that often.

I think the intent is clear there, SE probably doesn't complain; because... obviously it's the same money for them, but I don't think it's a great idea long term to foster that kind of nonsense. It'd be better for a likely 60+ people to remain subbed because they're enjoying that facet of the game, rather than the 30 accounts for one person and all the bad PR for ignoring it.

snip

i cant believe you compared a youtuber complaining about the shitty housing system and people circumventing deliberate limitations to terrorists
forget rude, you are unhinged dude