Yeah because we all lost to imaginary participant 0. I can account for 3 separate fc's that did not get a house and they were the only ones to bid on it.
I don't understand this FC with one member stuff don't FC's recruit and become more? I started mine and ask them all to please stay but they all left and since I have recruited two more but I have insurance with 3 alts to make sure I don't lose it. I am always recruiting and am more active then 3 people combined and I love gardening and sail boating/submarining so what's not to like? Everyone needs to make 3 alts and get a fc house if there are not enough single personnel's. I have the time to make it work maybe you don't ...Frankly they should have gone with 25% of the available wards and reserve 50% of the total big plot for the fc and no more, i mean what the point of locking small plot for fc ? Unless it's a one player fc any free company can afford a medium sized plot.
And i don't see why FC with only one member should be prioritize in any way.
sagacious
It's been around for a while. The old system was first wave was restricted to FC and relocating. FC's for FC facilities and relocating because it opened up houses all over the older areas for people to go after.I don't understand this FC with one member stuff don't FC's recruit and become more? I started mine and ask them all to please stay but they all left and since I have recruited two more but I have insurance with 3 alts to make sure I don't lose it. I am always recruiting and am more active then 3 people combined and I love gardening and sail boating/submarining so what's not to like? Everyone needs to make 3 alts and get a fc house if there are not enough single personnel's. I have the time to make it work maybe you don't ...
So a lot of people made what is basically a solo FC to get first dibs on bigger houses and skip the process of getting any small you can so you can relocate later on. I guess antisocial to the point of sacrificing ever having FC access so you can skip the line for a house is a lot more common than it should be
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.