Quote Originally Posted by Theodric View Post
Who would be part of this hypothetical 'all', exactly? I simply ask because it isn't the first time I've seen an insinuation of some hypothetical group existing to discuss the same topic across multiple threads.
The same handful people who play out these discussion is what I’m referring to. I’d even include myself.

Quote Originally Posted by Theodric View Post
Furthermore, just because a particular discussion may have become tiresome for you it doesn't necessarily mean that everybody else has to feel the same way - or that they're wrong or posting in bad faith for...pointing out their concerns with the quality of the writing surrounding Venat?
Then make a thread. Or use the other threads already made for that.

Quote Originally Posted by Theodric View Post
I also have to raise an eyebrow at anyone who frequents the lore forum taking issue with repetition when a not insignificant number of Venat enthusiasts spent years derailing threads and attacking people for liking either the Garleans or the Ascians.
If you’d like to point out a post whether I attacked someone for liking Garlemald or the Ascians then I’d be happy to discuss my personal statements.

Quote Originally Posted by Theodric View Post
I can personally attest to many attempts to simply take the 'agree to disagree' approach with various posters, yourself included. If you do not wish to engage with particular posters, then that's your right - but I must confess to not seeing much benefit in fly by comments every time someone brings up Venat and calls her out for the horrific genocide that she inflicted on so many innocents.
This is bait.