You can't even code a simple random number picker correctly.

[LeonKeyh]

... No it wouldn't? 0+1, 1+1, 2+1, and so forth.

The person didn't say "Add 1 to whatever comes up." The person said "add 1 if it's 0" which would mean #1 would win on 0 and 1.

Likely whatever random number function takes a max number and outputs a number from 0-#. What SHOULD have been done is either

1. Start the entries at 0 and make the max the biggest ID

2. RND(# of entries-1)+1

This is a fairly easy mistake to make with programming because of the differences between random number functions. But it should have been caught in QA for sure.

My guess is they utilized the Cactuar Pot logic for the randomization which does hit 0000.