If WHM did the most damage out of the healers but everything else was the same, what would you think of it?

I know this is basically the case with DRK. They do the most damage but people are still upset that it's rotation isn't fun, Living Dead is trash without Benediction, etc.

But for WHM, are the problems that big/fundamental? Or would people just treat them like minor inconveniences, if it meant they were doing the most damage?

If WHM just got +30 potency on Glare and +120 on Misery (about 7-8% overall DPS buff) and nothing else, how many people would shift their perspective to something like this? "WHM design is quirky/nuanced, but that allows skilled players to do the most damage." And how many would stick with the opinion that it's outdated/janky/unsatisfying? (But at least it's not unfair anymore, because WHM gets to be the best at something.)

Sorry to ask the same question several times. I just want people to think about it and give their honest answer, not a knee-jerk reaction.