Job action combos one button

[Lilyth]

Then bind Glare to 3 different keys and rotate, 1-2-3, through them. And just like that, your WHM play is "inherently more fun" now.

If there's anything worse than doing a 1 button rotation is this argument. If I told you they were gonna give Savage loot for free the next patch upon talking to the NPC and people complained about it, do you think it's fair to say "Hey just pretend is still locked behind savage, and just like that nothing has changed, everyone is happy now"?

1-2-3 might not be the hardest most punishing thing out there, but it's something. At least it's a reason for three individual actions to still exist. You have a sequence of different commands and chaining them in a specific order gives you more damage. With 1-1-1-1-1, 3 different actions accomplish nothing, it's just visual padding. There to give players the impression your char still has some modicum of combat interaction when in reality replacing everything with an insta-cast generic "glare" would be the same thing.

I honestly rather keep my 1-2-3 over that.

[Shurrikhan]

If there's anything worse than doing a 1 button rotation is this argument.

Is there another way to read...

Press 1-2-3 is inherently more fun than pressing 1-1-1. It doesn't matter if it's the same skill repeated

? Either hitting more buttons than is currently necessary is thereby "inherently more fun," or it is not.

But, fine, let us assume that the claim (1-2-3 being inherently more fun than 1-1-1 even when they have the same number of separable actions) carries an implied parameter -- that this only works "if forced (to 1-2-3, rather than 1-1-1)." We'll adjust the analogy:

You have Glare I, Glare II, and Glare III. Glare I does 290. Glare II does 310 if comboed -- otherwise, 100. Glare III does 330 if comboed -- otherwise, 100. The combo cannot be broken by actions, thereby retaining the old functionality, and over time they amount to the exact same ppgcd as before. They also have the same animation, since "it doesn't matter if it's the same skill repeated."

Is that "inherently more fun" button-flow of now being obliged to go 1-2-3 worth the added button cost? Would you give up 2 existing actions, and therein kit control, for those extra two buttons to be spent on what still amounts to a single, inseparable decision?

That's essentially what's forced onto any combo-heavy kit right now.

At least it's a reason for three individual actions to still exist.

No series of actions as would be demarked by a PvP combo have ever each had more than one individual action, as there has never been any remotely viable reason to restart or rush a combo. But even consolidated, a combo still has just as many non-individual actions as before. Button count =/= action count.

Unconsolidated, a Chaos Thrust combo includes flat damage, a damage buff, and a DoT, flat damage, and flat damage with a Draconian Fire proc -- each on a respective action in its own GCD. Each action takes a button-press. The single path of action, however, takes 5 buttons.

Consolidated, a Chaos Thrust combo would include flat damage, a damage buff, and a DoT, flat damage, and flat damage with a Draconian Fire proc -- each on a respective action in its own GCD. Each action would take a button-press. The single path of action, however, would take only a single button.

Holding onto that pretense of complexity, as compared to actually making use of individual actions as per Monk or consolidating them as per the Gnashing Fang combo, is just bloat. Asking that every non-individual action, too, each get its own button is basically just giving the middle finger to anyone who wants more actual depth on a combo-based job.

Either make them individual actions (as on Monk) or make them individual decisions (as per Gnashing Fang).

[AnotherPerson]

Is there another way to read...? Either hitting more buttons that is currently necessary is thereby "inherently more fun," or it is not.

But, fine, let us assume that the claim implied that this only works "if forced." We'll adjust the analogy:

You have Glare I, Glare II, and Glare III. Glare I does 290. Glare II does 310 if comboed -- otherwise, 100. Glare III does 330 if comboed -- otherwise 100. The combo cannot be broken by actions, thereby retaining the old functionality, and over time they amount to the exact same ppgcd as before. They also have the same animation, since "it doesn't matter if it's the same skill repeated."

Is that "inherently more fun" button-flow of now being obliged to go 1-2-3 worth the added button cost? Would you give up 2 existing actions, and therein kit control, for those extra two buttons to be spent on what still amounts to a single, inseparable decision?

That's essentially what's forced onto any combo-heavy kit right now.

Combos that doesn't offer much isn't that much more fun. But, if you look at it from another perspective, say Lv 1-29:
Say you just have 1 button as your skill rotation, and only one button. From level 1 to 29.

Do you feel a sense of progression? Do you feel like anything has changed from Satasha to Hakkuke Manor? Nope. Now imagine you go to level 50 and your main rotation is still 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1. All you're doing until then is just watching the enemy... dodging the mechanic... and then monotonously mashing the 1 key on auto-pilot until something new changes. You're not inherently have to spend brain power on the thought process - whether you're on the 2nd combo or whether you need to reset the combo because you're on the 3rd combo action. You just... press 1 until the fight's over.

Therein lies the difference between spamming Glare x100 and having a 3 button combo.

I completely agree with you - consolidating combo skills to create room for more INTERACTIVE skills and synergies will be great. However, that's not what was addressed on the thread. Nothing was mentioned about consolidating skills to make room for more interesting skills. In that case, it's more preferable to keep the current system with a 1-2-3 combo than without.

[Jijifli]

Combos that doesn't offer much isn't that much more fun. But, if you look at it from another perspective, say Lv 1-29:
Say you just have 1 button as your skill rotation, and only one button. From level 1 to 29.

Do you feel a sense of progression? Do you feel like anything has changed from Satasha to Hakkuke Manor? Nope.

I just wanna put my boomer pants on to remind the class that this literally was DRG in its original state. You pressed the exact same key, with no combo or positional check, until level 26. It was absolutely mind numbing to get any sync to that level on drg while leveling it, like if I did a roulette in leveling and got Halatali. It was already bad enough I got Halatali, now it's worse that my button line was reduced to a single key press.

Now, imagine that's it, like mentioned in the part I cut out. You're just gonna fall asleep. I know, because I fall asleep.

[Canadane]

But, fine, let us assume that the claim (1-2-3 being inherently more fun than 1-1-1 even when they have the same number of separable actions) carries an implied parameter -- that this only works "if forced (to 1-2-3, rather than 1-1-1)." We'll adjust the analogy:

You have Glare I, Glare II, and Glare III. Glare I does 290. Glare II does 310 if comboed -- otherwise, 100. Glare III does 330 if comboed -- otherwise, 100. The combo cannot be broken by actions, thereby retaining the old functionality, and over time they amount to the exact same ppgcd as before. They also have the same animation, since "it doesn't matter if it's the same skill repeated."

Is that "inherently more fun" button-flow of now being obliged to go 1-2-3 worth the added button cost? Would you give up 2 existing actions, and therein kit control, for those extra two buttons to be spent on what still amounts to a single, inseparable decision?

Yes.
As I mentioned, it's not the actions ingame, it's the actions IRL.

Multiple actions comboing off a single button makes it feel more like a smartphone game where it's just tap to win, or some other rudimentary simplistic system. It's not fun, nor is it engaging to play.
You could be doing sick flips and attacks and spark fire from the heavens, but if you're just pressing a single button to make it all happen, why not just go play one of those dime-a-dozen anime gacha games instead?

[Shurrikhan]

Yes [having 3 identical skills we'd be forced to rotate through is inherently more fun, no matter what is sacrificed to provide that button space for the extra, needless steps].

Multiple actions comboing off a single button makes it feel more like a smartphone game where it's just tap to win, or some other rudimentary simplistic system. It's not fun, nor is it engaging to play.
You could be doing sick flips and attacks and spark fire from the heavens, but if you're just pressing a single button to make it all happen, why not just go play one of those dime-a-dozen anime gacha games instead?

Because pressing a single button for a single decision isn't remotely what makes a game a "dime-a-dozen anime gacha game" (whatever the hell that may be) any more than having to having to hit up to 7 buttons for a single decision is core to what makes XIV?

But, where would we be if "Can we consolidate mutually exclusive skill X and Y?" wasn't met with "Go play something else then," I wonder?