Quote Originally Posted by Izar_Chillen View Post
If they intended on making the housing system virtual neighbourhoods and not solo instances , like they did do , and not have ill intentions , they would have ensured that they had server space for the large amount of player housing that was inevitably happening due to the vast interest from said player feedback in the first place and not tie the housing plots to a subscription, permanently, and not remove that caveat once said server spaces were fulfilled , which they aren't because they haven't done any server buying just for these housing estates since they added them.


This excuse is it needs to be tied to sub so that it frees up houses for players that want a house over those that have left the game all the whilst hiding the fact they they should have bought the server space to make virtual housing neighbourhoods a non issue and also at the same time coerce those that have a massive amount of sunk costs in their virtual homes to keep subbing or they lose their time and effort in just 45 days of non payment.
I personally don't think the argument of "just buy more servers lul" is as realistic as people make it out to be. I also don't get where you say they were ever "hiding" anything? And yeah, you don't pay your rent you get evicted. Not sure why this is super far-fetched, though again, maybe it's just me. Like, if they NEVER added new wards or new housing districts then MAYBE I could agree on them being scummy about it. They are even adding in new systems to house buying to ensure people have a fair chance and houses don't all get bought up by the same people, which seems like an anti-scummy move to me.