Increase Membership limits per Cross World Linkshell

[Tranquilmelody7]

I'm inclined to believe it's not intentional, and merely a temporary limitation as SE works on upgrading the back end


Still, it's good to raise awareness on the issue and how much a resolution would be appreciated

[Mandudez]

I'm inclined to believe it's not intentional, and merely a temporary limitation as SE works on upgrading the back end


Still, it's good to raise awareness on the issue and how much a resolution would be appreciated

We literally have zero size increases since LS's came out. How long do you consider temporary? lol

[Tranquilmelody7]

We literally have zero size increases sense LS's came out. How long do you consider temporary? lol

14's development is very busy
It's likely simply not a priority

Also that isn't quite true
Initially players were only allowed to join one CWLS

[Jojoya]

Definitely an increased limit would be a welcome thing. The fewer members a linkshell can hold, the greater the number of linkshells that need to be created to reach the community. That ends up adding to chat spam as more messages need to be created.

We literally have zero size increases since LS's came out. How long do you consider temporary? lol

YoshiP mentioned around the time that cross world linkshells were added that they had tried to increase same world linkshell limits from 128 to 256 but it caused their internal testing servers to crash. Maybe it's a problem that they're still trying to solve, or something that will be dependent on their future infrastructure upgrades.

But if same world can handle 128, you would think that cross world should be able to handle the same limit.

[Louvain]

Definitely an increased limit would be a welcome thing. The fewer members a linkshell can hold, the greater the number of linkshells that need to be created to reach the community. That ends up adding to chat spam as more messages need to be created.

And eventually, the newer linkshells that have to be made are isolated from older ones, which creates a communication gap.

[Reinha]

YoshiP mentioned around the time that cross world linkshells were added that they had tried to increase same world linkshell limits from 128 to 256 but it caused their internal testing servers to crash. Maybe it's a problem that they're still trying to solve, or something that will be dependent on their future infrastructure upgrades.

But if same world can handle 128, you would think that cross world should be able to handle the same limit.

I would prefer it if they focused their efforts on increasing cross world linkshell capacity to at least 256, simply because they have more uses than regular linkshells.

[Louvain]

I would prefer it if they focused their efforts on increasing cross world linkshell capacity to at least 256, simply because they have more uses than regular linkshells.

idk about 256 seeing as how we're still at 64, but I do agree that if I had to pick, I would prioritize cwl expansion over regular ls as they are just much more flexible and useful.

[Louvain]

Another week, another bump. My CWL chat spam from relays is not getting any better!

[Louvain]

Liveletter was this past weekend and still no word about possible LS size increases, so another bump for the thread it is.

[Fhaerron]

Servers will explode.