Warning for "Grief" Tactics?!

[Raoabolic]

I'll only ask this once.
WHO
STOLE
MY
[_______]
CLOUDSONG?!

[Senn]

...

Very well put. A report doesn't necessarily mean action will be taken on the account. The report was reviewed by a GM and deemed to violate the ToS.

[LianaThorne]

What's ironic when I said I was fake in the game too? Sorry I'm not a forum-goer crybaby I guess?

Question, why are you on the forum and fighting/crying with someone else then?

[Maxilor]

I'll only ask this once.
WHO
STOLE
MY
[_______]
CLOUDSONG?!

Whoa! Be careful with that. That meme is an antique.

[ReynTime]

With the amount of virtue signaling self righteous people in this community I'll be surprised if a bunch of people here don't start pointing their fingers at you and claim you're lying or not telling the whole truth, etc...

[Kaurhz]

With the amount of virtue signaling self righteous people in this community I'll be surprised if a bunch of people here don't start pointing their fingers at you and claim you're lying or not telling the whole truth, etc...

Well it is a fairly common occurrence and pretty much well known that people omit certain details pertaining to their sanction because it doesn't conform to their innocent narrative

People will want a little more than "I promise I done nothing wrong".

[Denji]

With the amount of virtue signaling self righteous people in this community I'll be surprised if a bunch of people here don't start pointing their fingers at you and claim you're lying or not telling the whole truth, etc...

Nobody's pointing fingers. They're just indicating that op has blatantly admitted to doing things that would technically be against the tos and also how GMs have the capability to investigate what did or did not happen. In addition, people pointed out that this was a warning that can be challenged if one so wished. Was it fair? We don't know because we don't have the context required, all we have to work off of is what op has said and since they are the one with the warning it can be difficult to ascertain whether or not they are telling the truth.

tl;dr op has been belligerent in their defense even when given advice on what to do next and people don't appreciate that.

[SieyaM]

I haven't been through the whole thread but I can tell you what your problem is, its your attitude. Even your exchange with the GM was rude and demanding. You didn't contact them with an attitude of trying to resolve and issue, you contacted them with an attitude of " I don't deserve this mark I am too good and a paragon of the community get rid of it".

[Padudu]

With the amount of virtue signaling self righteous people in this community I'll be surprised if a bunch of people here don't start pointing their fingers at you and claim you're lying or not telling the whole truth, etc...

Yeah we should just take the person that constantly ditches parties and calling others whiners, crybabies, threaten to "turn into a monster", ect word for it that the GMs are 100% in the wrong. If we don't we're just bootlickers

[technole]

Well it is a fairly common occurrence and pretty much well known that people omit certain details pertaining to their sanction because it doesn't conform to their innocent narrative

People will want a little more than "I promise I done nothing wrong".

OP's behavior tells me there was a bit more than what was described. What was described is almost enough that they weren't totally in the clear when it comes to getting a warning.

Even telling people 'hey sorry, internet problems' can go a long way. People can't read your mind, for all they know they had a tank bail on them during their EW experience and the GM probably had to deal with something similar lately. A lot of factors can add up, but attitude and just being honest about what's going on can dispel a lot of situations, and prevent getting reported.