We really should be able to glamour other jobs' sets

[Raikai]

Ironically, that kind of does make an odd bit of sense lore wise if you've done the MCH quests - part of the questline involves arming the smallfolk of Ishgard with guns to provide a volunteer militia in Foundation, due to manpower shortages in the Temple Knights leading to a security issue. Given that armour set is meant to be Ishgardian (or at least emulating what outsiders think Ishgardians wear), having a set of armour for a melee class/Job have a gun attatched as decoration could be a reference to this.

Or I'm just grabbing at straws here... (probably this really).

Also, wasn't the Neo-Ishgardian set in the first place actually a winning entry in a 'Design your own armour' competition? If so, then it was actually a player that would have come up with that design and decoration....

IIRC the player designed just the aiming set (which was the category they won), and all of the variations were made based on that, so the choice of adding a pistol on the striking set is deliberate, just like they replicated the aiming top for healers but chose to remove the pistol.

Another one that I remembered is that the HW and ShB bard sets also have dagger holsters on their pants.

[ASkellington]

Bumping this up cause after graphics update, this should be one of the next things on the list.

[LordMcMutton]

I need this to happen so that I can wear the Bearsmaw gauntlets on MNK- I NEED BIGGER PUNCHY ARMS

[OgruMogru]

Yo seeing as tho Sch is basically getting an enforced appearance change that is completely antithetical to the entire job's aesthetic what say the devs apply that disregard for job identity across the board and let us glam whatever we want? you can always just impose an appearance change on us during combat that's completely out of our control like you did with Sch if it becomes too confusing to identify who's who >.>

[Ryonz]

Showing my support here cuz I do want the neo ishgardian sets on their not related jobs. dwd

[Kohl]

No class/job restrictions for glamour
No dye restrictions
No gender restrictions
No race restrictions
Clothing is clothing.

[Iakobos]

I would love to be able to disguise my caster gear with healers' gear. The latter role's is more attractive than the former's will ever be.

[PercibelTheren]

I would love to be able to disguise my caster gear with healers' gear. The latter role's is more attractive to me than the former's will ever be.

Aren't they just recolors of each other most of the time?

[ASkellington]

Aren't they just recolors of each other most of the time?

With some exceptions and differing dye channels yes.

Star Himation sets for example (healer gear only dyes the sash; caster gear dyes everything). Shire Gear also differs (I still want that caster coat dang it)

[mallleable]

Ugh. Found a coat that I would love to use for a VPR glam, but the game say I cannot. Please remove role locks for glam.