What's the point with that quite lackluster story in Endwalker?

[Renathras]

No, it is a serious question because to my understanding you were trying brush of criticism as "hate train", if i put it in a short term.

Okay, I'm just not going to bother anymore.

I can only say so many times "I literally did not say that AND literally continued the sentence to include people who don't hate the game critique it as well and that is fine". I'm not sure how much more clearly I can say it, but if people at this point still are going to lie about that and insist that's what I said against all evidence, my own clarifications, and pages of posts saying otherwise, there's no home in convincing you otherwise.

He is just going to keep whining about...

Okay, I'm just blocking you now. You literally read nothing I say, continue insisting I'm saying the same things I've debunked, there's no hope for reason there.

It NEEDS TO be those EXACT words? So implications mean nothing then? Should i be as condescending as you then?

Yup, we're done here.

Here's the problem: When you think someone is implying something and they say, outright, OVER A DOZEN TIMES that they were not, it's extremely rude to insist you know what they were saying better than they were.

THERE WAS NO FIRST INSULT. That's the issue. But if you are going to insist, after me saying over and over again that wasn't what I said, and knowing you can't find those exact words because I literally DID NOT SAY those exact words, then, once again, what's the point? If you're going to insist I was saying something I didn't say, even acknowledging that I didn't outright say it and you're basing your view on what you THINK I was implying, and will continue to force those words in my mouth even after I say every way to Sunday that I was NOT implying that, then what am I supposed to do?

If "I did not literally say that in the text" AND "I also didn't mean that in any way" are not sufficient, what WOULD BE?

"If I wrote 'Ren is a hater'" - EXCEPT I DID NOT WRITE anyone's <name> is a hater, now did I? AT ALL. There was no first post "full of attacks". Even in your initial deep dive into the post, you saw ONE sentence that you took THE FIRST PART OF and decided that was a "rant". You have the literal quote. You can't keep insisting something was said that was not said. But there's no way for me to convince you otherwise, so we're done here. Or at least I'm done with this BS.

.

This is why I say all the time people don't care about the truth, they're just looking for excuses to attack.

[Nebelheim]

Okay, I'm just not going to bother anymore.

I can only say so many times "I literally did not say that AND literally continued the sentence to include people who don't hate the game critique it as well and that is fine". I'm not sure how much more clearly I can say it, but if people at this point still are going to lie about that and insist that's what I said against all evidence, my own clarifications, and pages of posts saying otherwise, there's no home in convincing you otherwise.



Okay, I'm just blocking you now. You literally read nothing I say, continue insisting I'm saying the same things I've debunked, there's no hope for reason there.



Yup, we're done here.

Here's the problem: When you think someone is implying something and they say, outright, OVER A DOZEN TIMES that they were not, it's extremely rude to insist you know what they were saying better than they were.

THERE WAS NO FIRST INSULT. That's the issue. But if you are going to insist, after me saying over and over again that wasn't what I said, and knowing you can't find those exact words because I literally DID NOT SAY those exact words, then, once again, what's the point? If you're going to insist I was saying something I didn't say, even acknowledging that I didn't outright say it and you're basing your view on what you THINK I was implying, and will continue to force those words in my mouth even after I say every way to Sunday that I was NOT implying that, then what am I supposed to do?

If "I did not literally say that in the text" AND "I also didn't mean that in any way" are not sufficient, what WOULD BE?

"If I wrote 'Ren is a hater'" - EXCEPT I DID NOT WRITE anyone's <name> is a hater, now did I? AT ALL. There was no first post "full of attacks". Even in your initial deep dive into the post, you saw ONE sentence that you took THE FIRST PART OF and decided that was a "rant". You have the literal quote. You can't keep insisting something was said that was not said. But there's no way for me to convince you otherwise, so we're done here. Or at least I'm done with this BS.

.

This is why I say all the time people don't care about the truth, they're just looking for excuses to attack.

Your the one who jumped in and put words in peoples mouth and attacked people and now deflecting and claiming everyone is being negative and attacking you. Maybe you should get off the forums and take a break if everything comes across as an attack. I don't know what is going on in your real life but you should take a break and do some self reflecting or some therapy to talk out some personal issues you seem to have with every person you interact with on the internet. Your the one who started all this with your rant a few pages ago and indirectly calling people names and claiming people were bad faith arguing. You seem to always have personal issues with everyone you ever interact with on the forums. At this point im surprised anyone tries to interact/debate with you because you always feel attacked and put words in peoples mouth when no one ever attacks you. At this point I should be the one who should block you considering it's not the first time I was falsely accused of attacking you along with multiple others you accuse of attacking you when your generally the one who starts these "attacks".