omg, you totally missed the part where everyone said that Venat committed genocide. It was INTENSE, and everyone was like "yea, i never liked her, I'm just surprised it took everyone to catch on to how fake and evil she was."
So they invited nothing but sycophants, nice. Basically anyone with 2 braincells to rub together can see that having no difficulty curve and then a massive difficulty cliff from normal to even just extreme is not good design.
It's okay, they inadvertently say that during the raids anyway
For me, it's been that way since back in 6.0 during the Hydaelyn fight. (I really did try, for the record, to see it through, but frustration won out.)
(Though it would have started regardless when we were revving up to save the world and I was suddenly required to pause to give a bunch of neurotic scientists a pep talk. That was actually likely the moment I lost the ability to have faith in the writing completely.)
Mud slinging prior to 6.4 is an understatement. If I recall, it started during Shadowbringers, especially when it came concerning whether or not one felt "Emet-Selch did nothing wrong". You'd have the Ascian stans getting on the case of people who weren't in their favor, and people who weren't in their favor getting on the case of everybody who was. I do not recall any insane amounts mud slinging prior to that...off the top of my head anyway.I can't help but feel it's a little less a case of "things are just getting better" - the forums went really off the rails with the mud-slinging prior to 6.4's release - and more that previously, people with more positive inclinations towards the story were "this is fine"-ing the MSQ and holding off on criticism for what they presumed would be an eventual pay-off, only to have another patch offer... really not much of anything at all, which has led to more grumbling in a good chunk of the playerbase and by default made taking a more critical look at the game suddenly much more common and acceptable. There's still an air of bitterness about though, and some players still can't help but get in digs, as you can see here.
I wasn't around when that was going on, so I can't really comment. I just know that previously most of the conflict was contained to this and a few other threads, and generally happened when someone with a grievance against negative opinions would come in and obliquely imply something unflattering to start off an argument. For the past few weeks it seemed to suddenly reach a peak with both sides forming factions and taking out grudges on the other, until basically everyone was strawmanning each other and trolls started joining in and further stirring things up. 6.4 seems to have poured some water on it, thankfully.Mud slinging prior to 6.4 is an understatement. If I recall, it started during Shadowbringers, especially when it came concerning whether or not one felt "Emet-Selch did nothing wrong". You'd have the Ascian stans getting on the case of people who weren't in their favor, and people who weren't in their favor getting on the case of everybody who was. I do not recall any insane amounts mud slinging prior to that...off the top of my head anyway.
...I kind of regret not being around, though. I'd love to see the logic employed behind such arguments.
My favorite part was when she sundered everyone again, making them even shorter.
I keep feeling the quest dialogues are like subtweeting You Know Who, even in English, lol. Guess I am not the only one.Oh, you guys will love this particular little tidbit of the French localisation:
Instead of commenting on Athena's ambition with "And you would destroy the lives already upon it!", Erichthonios says "You would destroy current mankind to replace it with your 'new species'!? This is madness, that's… genocide!".
Interesting phrasing, isn't it? It's like you could literally just transpose this, word for word, particularly the specification of current mankind (because there is a special place in the sea of stars for people who just lump the Ancients and the Sundered under one big "mankind, unspecified"), to what anyone at all SHOULD have said to Venat.
Hey… she does have exactly the same eye color after all, doesn't she? Mommy…
I know that many of the dialogues by Lahabrea are really meant to hint on and contrast with what he became in the end, but the funny thing is whatever you want to say about Lahabrea it applies twice more to Venat, so the effect becomes hilarious and why I feel its basically subtweeting her.
Last edited by ArcturusWhisper; 06-07-2023 at 01:32 AM.
I did the patch, I am upset at they fact they fixed the King Slime Hat on flight movement as Vrtra wasn't nearly as insane as Shinryu was at the end of EW in the physics. Moving onto the story it was...bad. The more I reflect on it the more I end up disliking it. So Golbez should have been a solo fight if he was just going to shake off the fight and go ahead like I barely scratched him anyway. In terms of the rest of the story I skipped one cut scene as the recap my friends gave me was enough to get what was going on and I didn't really care to see another food scene and fan-service Estinien. Overall this arc just feels bad to me in so many regards like the power-scaling and just how uninterested I am in Zero are major factors of me not enjoying the story arc much.
I will also cite doing optional content really didn't help this story arc. Oh you did Void quests? Sorry we can't even give you an option to say they are busy and can't help. You did the EW final role quest? Sorry it will never get brought up again as it has too many requirements. I really found it funny i needed permission to get in a tower I was already in once to deal with the final role quest. Like I understand there was more then just entering the tower but I would have liked "So can I bring up I saved you all from the blasphemy of the final role quest and call it even?"
Honestly 7.0 better show me something more interesting and I am just not excited for the main thing the game sells itself on, the story. I did enjoy the other content don't get me wrong but it is done so quickly I feel like I can just go "Actually play at launch and the X.55" camp if it continues as Endwalker has and I would save a ton of time and money.
Last edited by Xeronia; 06-07-2023 at 02:45 AM.
Why is this useless thread bumped again?
827 pages of discussing drunken writers' attempt at hardcore 20th century philosophy?
It's not that deep: the writers wanted to write a deep, nuanced story but failed. Which is why we have Venat and why the story is so inconsistent on whether Venat is "good" or "bad", in a way that miraculously somehow still doesn't portray any nuance. Imagine that.
827 pages of trying to find Answers in bad writing.
This thread started off basically saying that but now it's Venat vs Zodiark fanclub fight lol
Bruh even the writers don't know wtf they're writing and what exactly they want there's literally no point in trying to analyze this as if it's writing deserving of analysis. Don't forget that they try very hard to retcon characters because they are popular. E.g. Yshtola was supposed to die in 2.x but survived because people buy body pillows of her.
Last edited by GaiusDrakon; 06-07-2023 at 02:27 PM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.