Quote Originally Posted by Raskbuck View Post
I feel like there's a conceptual misunderstanding of what a furry entails. Some people tend to associate them with the cringy, overly cutesy anthropomorphic cartoons; meaning that anything that doesn't fit into that mold is automatically discarded by definition.

However, most people in the furry community would disagree with that definition. To them, a furry is nothing more and nothing less of the depiction of an anthropomorphic animal performing activities in a human setting. That would include Minotaurs, Werewolves, and anything else that fits that description. Including Worgens, Taurens, Hrothgars, Khajiit, Argonians (technically considered a scalie), and so on.

I understand the desire to be as far away from those furries we see doing things online that evoke second-hand embarrassment. But, much like every community has it's fair share of bad apples, a few actors do not define the genre as a whole. It would be like denouncing the concepts of weebs within the anime community, while saying you are not one because you only watch Dragonball, Pokemon, and whatever else is considered mainstream.
That be all true. Personally, I just find it fun to poke fun at every once in awhile. Got nothing against the normal furries. :3

The degenerate ones that give the rest of their community a bad name, however...that's another story. xD