Thread: Patch 6.05 Notes

Originally Posted by Velnora

Hybrid taxes are a dumb, archaic concept. Instead of deliberately lowering jobs damage, they should just give all dps some form of utility, and strive for equal damage.

This is far too parser-centric in thought.

DRG has lower personal DPS than other certain other DPS because it adds some damage back in through buffs to the party. People should not focus solely on parse data but rather who clears and who doesn't.

Originally Posted by Recon1o6

hps is a terrible measure of healing power anyway since its all spikes rather than constant healing

HPS isn't a terrible measure. HPS just doesn't add context to all situations where healing is necessary. The fact remains that Sage and their healing potential is not broken. They feel more powerful than they actually are because of how Eukrasia functions by turning your spells into improved instant-cast abilities. Being able to bypass cast-times is amazing, but the Sage is still restricted to GCD cooldowns and oGCD abilities the same as Scholar.

The skill ceiling for Sage and Scholar are both high. Scholar to an even greater amount.

Originally Posted by TheMightyMollusk

So the shield healers, whose gimmick is preventing damage, are behind the pure healers, whose gimmick is restoring damage, when it comes to restoring damage. Um......

Yes, healers are balanced right now with the exception of some bad changes to White Mage. The Thin Air Nerf and the Lilybell only working when the White Mage himself takes damage are horrific for the White Mage.

Originally Posted by Furious

Utterly nonsensical, I sure hope they address it directly. Why would any group EVER not take a sage at the current numbers they are doing? I think most healers were prepping simply on the premise that sage was absolutely going to get nerfed, their dps numbers are utterly absurd.

4.05, massive balance changes.
5.05, massive balance changes.

6.0 worse balanced than 4.0 and 5.0, almost zero balance changes and entirely miss all worst offenders.

Very hard to comprehend.

Not really? Scholars with Expedient feels really good to use. Lots of people I know who is taking Scholar to savage raids says their team prefers Expedient for that movement speed buff that doubles as a mitigation tool. Plus, recovery is much easier on Scholar than on SGE.

Plus, SCH have raid buff, which only get stronger under raid buff stacking.

Originally Posted by ArkenaeuxBelmont

How do people not understand this? Balancing around Savage makes the casual content for casuals *easier*. Not harder.

Maybe the game shouldn't be so easy I can auto-attack through most of it with the only mildly challenging content being extreme and savage, which demands you jump through considerably more hoops than anything else just to do. But also Savage demands a different playstyle than the rest of the game, so balancing for it means balancing for the players who optimize and play as close to perfect as they can.

I think current monk is probably the best example of this; once you get the hang of blitz, its timers and the gist of what you're supposed to do, it's not hard to use at all and performs above how it feels like it is. But a lot of people struggle with keeping monk's blitz cycles going and fall out of synch which makes the class feel sloppy and awkward. So rather than rewarding you for performing well, it feels like you have to perform well for the class to not feel like a mess.

Basically, I guess, I'm saying that by tuning specifically for end game content it makes the rest of the game feel like it doesn't matter at all which, in turn, has made it all feel pretty dull and rote in comparison.

Originally Posted by Haseno

HPS isn't a terrible measure.

HPS is absolutely a terrible measure. The messier a run and the less mitigation your group uses, the more you need to heal and the better your HPS. If a WHM spams Cure III immediately when damage happens and a Sage lets their HoT's and oGCD's do the work, the Sage will have bad HPS and the WHM won't. Many top healers will end a run with grey logs on healing, despite 0 deaths, simply because the group played efficiently. Sage has quite a lot of free oGCD's and can heal for free for longer before being forced to dip into GCD's.

Not saying Sage needs a nerf though, SCH and AST are comparatively more than fine when it comes to heal toolkit. If anything WHM needs a buff, because it's far behind.

Originally Posted by Dewslam

Maybe the game shouldn't be so easy I can auto-attack through most of it with the only mildly challenging content being extreme and savage, which demands you jump through considerably more hoops than anything else just to do. But also Savage demands a different playstyle than the rest of the game, so balancing for it means balancing for the players who optimize and play as close to perfect as they can.

I think current monk is probably the best example of this; once you get the hang of blitz, its timers and the gist of what you're supposed to do, it's not hard to use at all and performs above how it feels like it is. But a lot of people struggle with keeping monk's blitz cycles going and fall out of synch which makes the class feel sloppy and awkward. So rather than rewarding you for performing well, it feels like you have to perform well for the class to not feel like a mess.

Basically, I guess, I'm saying that by tuning specifically for end game content it makes the rest of the game feel like it doesn't matter at all which, in turn, has made it all feel pretty dull and rote in comparison.

I'm not arguing the case to make the game easier.

I'm attempting to explain to people that have the viewpoint that "balancing a job's performance around their performance in savage" is somehow making the jobs "harder".

Believing that fact is a logical fallacy, because if a job is tiered to be balanced and perform well in savage, then it is going to perform well in more casual content with sub-optimal play.