Parsing unfair but okay?

[Raven2014]

I never wanted the players banned. Its more on since SE can\\\\'t pick a side they openly discriminate against a player base

This could be be a me problem because I am an ESL. But I gotta ask ... is English such a limited language that the word "discrimination" need to be used so frequently? In my own language it's a heavy and critical word, reserved for serious social problem only. Not something liberally threw around whenever someone don't get their way ... in a video game no less.

But like I said, maybe that's just me.

I think the thing people should be focusing on is that the original poster is having a difficult time finding a static because other players are expecting them to provide parser logs showing their performance.

Let's pretend third-party parse tools just didn't work in this game, and so they simply weren't something our community could use. Can we all agree that would remove the current hurdle the original poster is facing?

So, for this player, essentially a third party tool is creating a barrier for access. Isn't that the whole problem with parsing tools the developers wanted to avoid?

Requiring parse logs from a static is a long way away from using a parser to harmlessly monitor your own performance.

Except a static is not an in-game thing. It's a personal-defined group, as such it's completely reasonable for player themselves to decide which parameter to join their group. In this instance, a parser (or lack-there-off) does not prevent the player from accessing the content. There are PF which for the most part, can be freely join. Even so the game also include other things to let players define their parameters of who can and can not join. Or what next, are we gonna cry ilvl requirement a discrimination against ungeared player? Is Duty Complete a discrimination against players who haven't cleared?

In this instance, the OP is simply masking a personal problem as "discrimination" to play the victim. There is pug, there is casual static in which he/she can use as stepping stones to higher level group. The problem is the OP is wanting to join a Midcore static despite having no qualification. I ask ... why stop there? What about HC static? What about week 1 static? Are we gonna accusing them of discrimination 'cause they don't just accept anyone? I had been in week 1 static before and do you know how much drama ensure when someone does not perform as expected? If anything, filters like these is better for everyone's mental health in the long run because it let people of similar mindset and skill set to group up together.