Quote Originally Posted by Xrystofer View Post
First off, you quoted an entirely different post to the post that you replied to.
I can read more than one post and maintain the thread of a subject. I kinda assumed you could too. I am sorry if what I did was confusing.


Quote Originally Posted by Xrystofer View Post
Second of all, I am asking this question because it's a good point. It proves that some hunts are entirely pointless and a waste of time.
It proves it's not efficient enough for what you want and isn't worthwhile TO YOU. That's all. My experience is it's well worth the 10-20 minutes I invest in doing all the bills a day. If it was only a source of experience I might agree, but it's not.


Quote Originally Posted by Xrystofer View Post
That is incorrect and it's simply your assumption. It doesn't have to be the most efficient, but it does have to be viable. Getting 3 sacks of nuts is an underwhelming reward for an activity that is limited.
Which isn't proof that it's not viable. It worked for me, it doesn't work for you. I'm not assuming anything, you have clearly expressed an opinion that it's not enough stuff. I may be overstating it, but you want more for the same thing. It's not a viable GRIND, it's a perfectly viable path towards the rewards.


Quote Originally Posted by Xrystofer View Post
No, you have simply misconstrued what I said. It doesn't have to be the best method, it simply has to be viable, and getting 3 nuts is not a viable method for nuts in my opinion.
Do you NOT want more rewards so you can get the stuff faster? Is this not the entire point of your post? You are welcome to your opinion and I have mine supported by the fact that not only do I have the rewards, I have gotten them in a reasonable amount of time.