First off, you quoted an entirely different post to the post that you replied to. Second of all, I am asking this question because it's a good point. It proves that some hunts are entirely pointless and a waste of time.
That is incorrect and it's simply your assumption. It doesn't have to be the most efficient, but it does have to be viable. Getting 3 sacks of nuts is an underwhelming reward for an activity that is limited.
No, you have simply misconstrued what I said. It doesn't have to be the best method, it simply has to be viable, and getting 3 nuts is not a viable method for nuts in my opinion.


Reply With Quote



