No because this. If everyone else can own their own private estate, why shouldn't FC leaders? FC estates is shared property basically, you can't lock the doors and keep your FC members out. Everyone should have the ability to have their own form of privacy.
I mean... FC houses are literally no different, other than setting permissions. You could have the same permissions, or even more extensive if need be. At the end of the day, the FC house isn't *really* shared property, because the FC only has the permissions granted by the FC leader, which can be given or taken away at their discretion. No reason that would change at all.
The ONLY difference is that FC leaders would not own separate houses; thus if you DO own a private estate AND a FC estate, you would either give one of them up, or give the FC estate to a trusted member. And if you don't have a member you would trust enough to give the estate to... well, that sounds kind of like a "second house" for you.
This pops up periodically. I get it - there isn't enough housing. The answer isn't taking housing away from anyone - it's SE FIXING their housing so anyone who wants a house can have one.
But if the player base wants to make the case for taking away housing ownership from anyone - it should be personal houses getting the boot and FC housing stays. And this is me saying that as an owner of a personal house. FC housing gives more people access to housing because multiple people are sharing and using that house - in some cases hundreds of people for the really large FCs.
Also, some wards come 6.1 will be FC housing only per Yoshi (I don't remember if it was a live letter or during the digital fanfest where he stated that). So no, they aren't going to take away FC housing.
Sorry I own a FC house and a personal right next to it on Spriggan. I am entitled to have my own private estate just like everyone else. I shouldn't have to share my house and call it a FC with everyone when they are able to own their own private houses and be a part of that FC.The ONLY difference is that FC leaders would not own separate houses; thus if you DO own a private estate AND a FC estate, you would either give one of them up, or give the FC estate to a trusted member. And if you don't have a member you would trust enough to give the estate to... well, that sounds kind of like a "second house" for you.
FC members can buy their own rooms in an FC house. I dunno if you're lying or actually that incorrect.I mean... FC houses are literally no different, other than setting permissions. You could have the same permissions, or even more extensive if need be. At the end of the day, the FC house isn't *really* shared property, because the FC only has the permissions granted by the FC leader, which can be given or taken away at their discretion. No reason that would change at all.
The ONLY difference is that FC leaders would not own separate houses; thus if you DO own a private estate AND a FC estate, you would either give one of them up, or give the FC estate to a trusted member. And if you don't have a member you would trust enough to give the estate to... well, that sounds kind of like a "second house" for you.
That permission no longer works with FC members. FC leads were abusing it keep FC members with rooms trapped in the FC.
Note: Taking advice from a players alt, is like taking advice from a voice in a dark room. Criticism is a two way street remember that!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.