Healers, not required. (EW SPOILERS)

[ErryK]

"no healers required"

take away second wind, curing waltz, bloodbath, clemency and bloodwhetting. if we don't need healers, we don't need healing actions.

oh wait...

edit: let's also not forget this is a premade that knows what they're doing. half of my own datacenter would be helpless without healers in the party.

[BrokentoothMarch]

"no healers required"

take away second wind, curing waltz, bloodbath, clemency and bloodwhetting. if we don't need healers, we don't need healing actions.

oh wait...

edit: let's also not forget this is a premade that knows what they're doing. half of my own datacenter would be helpless without healers in the party.

That's not how this works at all. Unless you intend to say a healer is only identified by their heal. Is this true? Then let's just rip that pesky damage spell and DoT they have. Shields? Haha, that's not a heal. Out you go. Buffs? Unless that buff makes HP go zoom, it should be shoved into the shredder and fed yet to another DPS as they are want to do.

What an insipid argument. There's plenty of reasons this proves little, but to say "If you have no healers, no heals allowed" is almost mind-numbingly insulting. It's this notion that healers and healing are so fundamentally married that one simply cannot exist without the other that has made the healing class able to be played to utter perfection by some primitive bot. If people can survive without healers because they have their own heals, that's a reality you can't modify to satisfy your snarky belief.

I'm positive you are very graceful and proud in your ability to press two buttons. Maybe, when you're feeling spicy, even THREE. But let's not pretend like healers have, ever had, or will ever have a monopoly on healing.