I mean, they told you, and apparently you bought it anyway. So if you knew it going into it, why complain now?
This is typically a good theory as no company wants to set up too many worlds and then immediately have to merge a bunch of them so they aren't empty. It's unlikely to be the case here though, and they've already offered you their reason, which I'm guessing you choose to disbelieve. I've noticed in the last day or so the queues seem to be a bit smaller. I do think it will get better just with time but not sure if the queues will actually go away until there are new servers. SE probably actually stands to lose more money by not having adequate servers than by buying them, so I don't really see what their motivation is to lie. I am sure that many people will cancel their subs with plans to come back when things have died down a bit, and I'd imagine there is some subset of people who will leave and never come back. If you have 2+ hour queues for a long period of time, you're simply going to lose subscribers, and that costs money.
I don't know why people on this forum struggle with how compensation works. The 7 days were compensation for lost time, not "7 free days during which you can't play". To be fair, I am starting to wonder if they actually intend to give any more compensation as they didn't address it in the update on the 11th, and I think they should, given that queues are still so long.
I mean, that's what you say given what you know now - if it had been delayed there would have been tons of complaints, most of them probably coming from the same group of people complaining now.
Yikes. Rolling back the servers is the one worst thing that SE could do that would make me, for one, extremely angry. You're talking about undoing the progress of a lot of players. That cure is much worse than the disease.
Typical forum etiquette would prefer that you express your opinion in an already extant thread if there is one. There are many to choose from, in this case.


Reply With Quote


