Plenty of lighter things to think about, but this one has been gnawing away at me since level 81, so I'm posting it now, and separately, just to get it out of my head.

Post-credits spoilers:
Corvos name dropped for the billionth time. Hoary Boulder and Coultenet are headed there to check things out in the wake of Garlemald's fall and the Final Days. It seems like tensions between the locals and the surviving Garlean expats is on the rise. Much like the sudden Mhach-dropping we got in Heavensward, it is likely that Corvos is about to play a very big role (my guess is either relic or trial series, if not the next expansion setting).

Some of those expats are House Darnus. Some of those locals are the Corvosi G. With Amon brought back as a primary antagonist, and the fall of Allag tying in thematically to the events of the final dungeon, I suspect the saga of the Allagan Royal Eye is far from over.

The additive retcons we've gotten on G'raha's backstory indicate the Allagan Eye was passed specifically to the firstborn son, and thus we can assume is the mark of a de facto nunh. This makes more sense than what we had to go on before, which was not only a vague "once in a generation" sort of thing, but G'raha's own casual admissions indicating it made him an outcast. We can now assume that part of his childhood happened in Sharlayan, and in his own birthplace he's essentially the chosen one.

Now where things get messy: Corvos was hit pretty badly by the Final Days, which likely means the Corovsi G were as well. G'raha has also expressed a desire to visit (just once, he says), which is already setting him up for an appearance when we go there. Given his unbearable sense of responsibility, it seems incredibly likely that G'raha will end up pressured into the role of nunh. That role is, at best, a form of voluntary sexual slavery, not something that should ever, under any circumstances, be forced on anyone. It would also be an incredibly tone-deaf development for a character who is (subtextually, anyway) a love interest but otherwise established as very asexual. ("Does G'raha Tia f*kupo*k?" is simply not a question that ever needed a canon answer. Same for pretty much everyone besides Thancred.)

Ishikawa knows better. Oda knows better. I would like to assume Yoshida knows better, since he's been signing off on all the subtext thus far even while he insists it's not romantic. And yet, seeing so many dominoes dropped in place all at once (and going as far back as the optional conversation in 5.3 about G'raha's "Tia" status), is just really quite odd, and I don't know what to make of it besides suddenly feeling really uncomfortable about his character trajectory. It's been a very, very long time since any of my darkest predictions have come true, and I really, really want to be wrong on this.