Eh, I don't think it makes it clunkier. It can be argued that having to chose between either using AF for DPS or Healing is part of SCH class design, but I don't personally think its a good niche to be the healer that is punished for using their healing oGCDs by losing DPS.
It's not a lot of DPS, but it's significant enough to make a difference. It would also remove Dissipation as an offensive ability which is IMO part of SCH issues.
As for the options I suggested, if having two extra mandatory weave slots taken by the ED is a problem (I personally think it breaks the Broil spam a bit, by having to weave some offensive options), I suggested just having ED be a 60s CD with 300 potency and granting 3 AF. You'd get all the potency from 3 EDs with the same APM than the old system.
Essentially these suggestions make it so there is no longer a choice between Healing or Damaging with your AF, which I think is a good thing for Scholar honestly. Ofc, that is just a matter of opinion, some people like that "punishing" aspect of Scholar, I think it just gets in the way and makes you feel bad for weaving healing in a job that is supposed to encourage weaving healing oGCDs.
Yes, you don't have an AF dump, but that could be solved by a trait such as something that gives you Fairy Gauge and MP based on how many stacks you have when re-gaining more AF stacks.



Reply With Quote







