"Everyone's so open and friendly" is a lie

[Snorky]

I don't have much time but;
not a single person aside from you has mentioned that the OP has edited their post to contain a different message than it does now, please provide proof of your statement that others have noticed it, too, or better yet, tell us what the OP originally posted

note that the OP also said "and arguments" both times which clearly showed to everyone with a bit of reading comprehension that they don't want to insult people without repercussions or reasons, instead it being about, quoting the OP again, "If someone has done something wrong, no matter how petty one may perceive it no one is allowed to be critical."

I believe the burden of proof is on you since you are the one calling me a liar. Please check page 18 comments about edits and beyond that posts being removed. Then someone said they doubted it was edited but in the same breath said the first post was posted at the same time as the edit. Omg so the OP edited before the first post how many people read his original post before it was edited I don't know and frankly don't care but YOU calling me a liar I do care about. I have no reason to LIE, personally I have my own moral standards if you don't like it I could care less. Seems to me you don't know the difference between being critical and being rude. They are not equal. I don't know what your problem is and it's your own problem not mine.

[Rinhi]

I believe the burden of proof is on you since you are the one calling me a liar. Please check page 18 comments about edits and beyond that posts being removed.

LOL
that posts and subsequent ones were about mods deleting multiple pages of discussion for literally no reason, that's what the poster is talking about, nice attempt at deflection, though
you'd have known had you actually read the posts and not just quickly skimmed the pages ctrl+f'ing for the word edit

and no, the burden of proof is on you because you said the OP edited their post to be less inflammatory and 'wanting to be able to freely insult people' as you have said

Then someone said they doubted it was edited but in the same breath said the first post was posted at the same time as the edit.

yeah it was edited, I never said it wasn't, but if it had said what you're insisting it said, it would've gotten a completely different response by the people that saw the """real""" post, so what's your point here

Omg so the OP edited before the first post how many people read his original post before it was edited I don't know and frankly don't care but YOU calling me a liar I do care about. I have no reason to LIE, personally I have my own moral standards if you don't like it I could care less. Seems to me you don't know the difference between being critical and being rude. They are not equal. I don't know what your problem is and it's your own problem not mine.

don't lie then? I don't know why people lie and I frankly don't care either, but I know that you decided that, for whatever reason, you were going to make an inflammatory post about the OP about something that could be easily be proven wrong to appear as a good person, at least that's my guess
I have my own standards, too, which is why I don't like liars and hypocrites (this was basically the topic that got removed and talked about at page 18 FYI)