Quote Originally Posted by Kenky View Post
You missed the mark entirely.

The "Why" was not in regards to housing. But learning the "Why" in Why people have those specific opinions. Why they take those stances. If you do not learn why the people disagreeing with you are actually disagreeing with you, then it is not a discussion worth having. If neither party discuss with an open mind and intent to try and find common ground, there is no point in the discussion taking place.

It would not be beneficial. It would just be a "who yells louder" match.

Quote Originally Posted by Kenky View Post
That actually works to SEs favour.

Sure, it may suck for the house-hunters. But if you want to try and get a house from someone that lost it as a result of problems out of their control, you're kind of distasteful. While disasters / outbreaks don't affect *you*, it affects *someone* and we, as a species, should care and empathize.
I think your virtue signal is stuck on. I got the gist of what you said that I was responding to.

Also, someone saying "I don't agree with you", is a complete sentence- further discussion isn't always wanted or needed. If they're not being nasty or disrespectful, then as far as I'm concerned, no harm, no foul. Tossing in some randomness like this need to communicate is just odd. If I can't get to my home and "refresh" it within the 45 day time frame, that sucks, but those are the rules. We can't stop the wheel for every person and/or every region that is affected by weather/technical/medical issues. It's just not a possibility. The pandemic was unique in that it affected the world.

Celebrating that you get a pixel plot doesn't mean you don't have empathy for someone else who is having a rough time and no longer has said pixel plot. It doesn't mean you're distasteful. It might just mean you don't know who those pixels "belonged" to or what circumstances lead into said pixels falling into your hands, but that they did and you're excited and that's okay.