Or just one running enough SkS to drop DK only on Demolish and DK itself (for 7+15 bonus potency lost, or at most an extra 8 from the normal auto, while gaining the 130 potency of an extra Boot-True per rotational string). Such could cause small but potentially notable gaps in the Int Down debuff.
This, and perhaps a bit more compensation for MTing (which, back then, every tank had in some different form -- DD, Reprisal, Low Blow, and self-heals if in tank-stance; Shield Swipe and MP generation; Vengeance and [very mild] rotational self-heals that didn't require tank stance).I wouldn't consider the proc-based gameplay on HW DRK to be 'tools' or 'utility'. It just ensured that your resource generation was more variable, forcing you to think on your feet.
Given the shit we'd bar lock out over minute rDPS gains (that ended up rivaled or even beat out by off-meta comps by StB's end), I wonder what would happen if we ever had to deal with actually playing differently depending on our comps, rather than merely having a 5% dmg shuffle from ones' aDPS to another's rDPS, etc. A true Pandemonium?FFXIV players tend to be very much against any randomness or variability that prevent you from mapping out your rotations on a spreadsheet, which is why DRK unfortunately has moved closer towards PLD style faceroll rotational design despite being originally set up as resource management tank. The problem is that it feeds back into this culture that every pull that you do has to be able to potentially yield a mathematically optimal result (even if you're not at the mechanical skill level where you can achieve said result), or else we just wipe and reset until you get the numbers that you want. This was the kind of thinking that made them effectively remove Crit/DH from affecting WAR. It's an incredibly dumb design direction. Who cares if you didn't crit on your 22nd Fell Cleave? Just play your best and you'll average at what you should.



Reply With Quote

