Quote Originally Posted by Jpec07 View Post
That’s precisely what I’m suggesting. A nonvolatile table with 325.8M rows, fully indexed and partitioned, will be incredibly performant for a join like this.
No read my other response. That's too much. Why join a table that big.... there is still a performance hit. Just cause the algorithm for joins is optimal doesn't mean it won't take some time.

See my other response.