Can we get polygamous eternal bonds?

[lezard21]

I don't think this is that weird. Some of y'all's biases are showing here in a pretty big way. Polyamorous people do exist.

They do. No one is saying polyamorous people are weird.

I'm saying requesting such a feature at a time when actual content is getting pushed back is a weird request.

It's about priorities, not about biases.

[Alaray]

They do. No one is saying polyamorous people are weird.

I'm saying requesting such a feature at a time when actual content is getting pushed back is a weird request.

It's about priorities, not about biases.

People can request features at any time, spark discussion of the possibility, and if it were to gain enough traction potentially have something worked on when possible. It's not like it'd be a priority even if the development team thought it was a good idea, it'd definitely be on a backburner.

[Katie_Kitty]

They do. No one is saying polyamorous people are weird.

I'm saying requesting such a feature at a time when actual content is getting pushed back is a weird request.

It's about priorities, not about biases.

Pretty normal for people to post about stuff they want. What's not normal is all of the people who immediately came in here acting like it was the most ridiculous suggestion ever, or like the OP was a troll for posting it. That definitely speaks to a bias.

[lezard21]

Pretty normal for people to post about stuff they want. What's not normal is all of the people who immediately came in here acting like it was the most ridiculous suggestion ever, or like the OP was a troll for posting it. That definitely speaks to a bias.

And just as it's normal for people to post about stuff they want, it's also pretty normal for people to post why they think it's a bad idea or why they think devs should focus on something else first.

The only bias I see is you choosing to see people that disagree with OP's suggestion as some sort of "polyamorphobic" people.

[Katie_Kitty]

And just as it's normal for people to post about stuff they want, it's also pretty normal for people to post why they think it's a bad idea or why they think devs should focus on something else first.

The only bias I see is you choosing to see people that disagree with OP's suggestion as some sort of "polyamorphobic" people.

I mean, we literally have one guy in this thread trying to push the "One man and one woman" narrative. It's hilariously naive to suggest there isn't some very open bias here in these comments.

[ClaudeHerel]

lmaoㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

[Lunalepsy]

The wonders of civilization.

[Bearded]

Eternal bond is based upon the heterosexual one on one bond and one has to carry the damn flowers even if both are makes.

It's pretend -its not really worth anything beyond the mounts

[Katie_Kitty]

Eternal bond is based upon the heterosexual one on one bond

Ah, yes, that very heterosexual one on one bond between two catgirls. How could we forget?