I wish Castrum and that other dungeon did have voiced because so far I have not been reading it all mainly because I'm a slow reader and I would love to know what is said.

I wish Castrum and that other dungeon did have voiced because so far I have not been reading it all mainly because I'm a slow reader and I would love to know what is said.



"A good RPG needs a healthy dose of imbalance."
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuC365vjzBFmvbu6M7dB80A



I don't know if it does or does, I suspect it doesn't and was just being snarky about how long MSQ dungeons are. But even then, if the players all realize how much more efficient Amarout will be, queue times should be low to get into there, or worst case, just throw up a party finder to farm it a few runs.






Is Amaurot really more efficient than the other level cap dungeons? I'd rather run something that drops glamour.I don't know if it does or does, I suspect it doesn't and was just being snarky about how long MSQ dungeons are. But even then, if the players all realize how much more efficient Amarout will be, queue times should be low to get into there, or worst case, just throw up a party finder to farm it a few runs.


Still find it weird it's coming a month late. Lol.



Amarout gives 5 moogle tomes, no other level 80 dungeon is included, so yes. It would be more efficient.
If you want a dungeon that has gear, it's pretty limited and the dungeon also gives fewer tomes. Baelsar's Wall, Ala Mhigo, and Ghymlit Dark are the only dungeons that have gear, and those give 4 tomes instead of 5.






Exactly, but if they only take 80% of the time it takes to run Amaurot then you've broken even on time and you're getting glamour besides.
Amaurot seems like a lot more of a slog than some of the others. Ghimlyt in particular seems quite fast for gathering large groups of enemies, and the glamour is fairly sought after for that.
Plus you'd get tokens for your relic weapon because it's a level 70 dungeon, which probably makes up for getting one less tome out of it even if it wasn't quicker.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



