Quote Originally Posted by SeverianLyonesse View Post
Again, please stop misquoting me. I said I don't think the design is good (and explain why it doesn't come together for me), and that I don't see it as a clearly better alternative to existing archetypes. Reducing it to "you don't like it" and "therefore it isn't original" is massively over-simplifying.
I will start by saying, I did cut your quote off a bit early, and the extra info does change the context slightly, however, saying you don't think a design is good is implying that the design is bad. You then say, because the design is 'not good' you therefore don't see it as an original concept and would have prefered a different job. This is all coming under your point that starts " As a matter of resonance, referentiality, fanservice, they seem to be struggling to find easy, marketable concepts to implement."

You have used your own personal bias towards a job aestheitc to say it is bad as a point to show that the team are running out of easily fanserviceable jobs. However, just because you do not like the aesthetic and you don't find it appealing doesn't mean that others do not. It is their content to get excited about, not yours. I personally wasn't too keen on the aesthetic of Dancer, it isn't a job I personally would have wanted, however I'm not going to use that to say they should have added X/Y/Z instead, or use it as a basis to say they are running out of ideas.

The jobs appeal to someone, that someone doesn't always have to be you. It is fine to not like it, but don't use it as an excuse to say they are running out of ideas/lack fanservice etc.