Search thread > fetish...
I stand corrected, In the context I was saying fetish I was talking about pedos who enjoy hentai because you are a pedo if you like that sort of thing. But hey at least you are good at pointing things out. Even though all your other takes are wrong.
again art hentai whatever. Still all in the same way.
If it is NOT real it is ok. America law even says that. What part of that is hard to understand?
So from what I got out of this thread is. My husband who is a sadist, and enjoys watching horror movies, Watching hentai that would make my eyes bleed, is a bad person because it turns him on and he could make a victim one day with said desires. Lmao
Ya, at this point some of you need more help than pedos.
(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A)depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B)is obscene; or
(2)
(A)depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B)lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A)depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B)is obscene; or
(2)
(A)depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B)lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
Someone already showed videos of cases where it is thrown out that art is not consider real, and the art has no rights.
So *shrugs* blame the courts I guess.
So hentai breaks so many laws it is not funny is what you getting at?
Exactly what are you quoting? There's absolutely no context here.(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A)depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B)is obscene; or
(2)
(A)depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B)lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
Regardless, the key word is "minor." As in, the subject of said drawing/recreation has to be "legally" a minor. To fit that legal designation the subject has to be a real person. I guess if it turns out Ryne has a birth certificate and a legal age, the people using those mods might be in trouble. You could literally say Ryne is a 19 year old with a small cup size because she's *ahem* NOT REAL.
United States v. Handley, 564 F. Supp. 2d 996 (2008), was a court case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa involving obscenity charges stemming from the importation of manga featuring pornographic depictions of fictional minors.
In February 2010, under the terms of plea, Handley was sentenced to six months in jail. Without the plea, he would have faced a maximum of 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Upon release he was required to undergo three years' supervised release and five years' probation.
This community does have issues with the game being real to them. So I'm not even shocked that people would fight for her rights.Exactly what are you quoting? There's absolutely no context here.
Regardless, the key word is "minor." As in, the subject of said drawing/recreation has to be "legally" a minor. To fit that legal designation the subject has to be a real person. I guess if it turns out Ryne has a birth certificate and a legal age the people using those mods might be in trouble. You could literally say Ryne is a 19 year old with a small cup size because she's *ahem* NOT REAL.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.