FCs buying multiple plots

[Almagnus1]

Ok, gonna gather thoughts and not do a massive series of edits as that's just generally cleaner....

Let's start with the entire thread:

No. My FC has three active players atm (including me). The rest either play very sporadically or are taking a break before the expac. Why should we lose our house because you think we should? We paid the money for it, we decorated it collectively. We have FC rooms (including ones for our members who are out on breaks and probably will return in Nov.) We've got a workshop with everything unlocked and both airships and submersibles at max level. We have friends come over from other FCs to hang out or roleplay.

Why should we lose all of that? Because we're one active member short? In an FC with 30 members? (18 separate accounts, and a bunch of alts).

People need to stop trying to take away from players. This is not a fix. The fix is pressuring SE to either give us more wards or finally institute instanced housing larger than just apartments.

Given the context of what we're discussing (as RMT is known to be used with shell FCs which are known to be used by FCs to flex with housing), I felt this was ambiguous, which is why I asked for clarification:

Can you clarify this point?

And you did with:

Very simple, we as an FC together collected the gil to pay for us to get exactly (1) house. That we all share.

I responded saying I was only seeking clarification on that point and why with:

There have been many that have exchanged all sorts of RL and crypto currency for homes, had to verify as "money" is a bit ambiguous whereas gil is not.

You do not accept this explanation because (to you) apparently I'm some sort of spawn of Zodiark:

Seriously? Why would you even assume that? Don't be disingenuous.

Knowing that a lot of the people that do not like me do so because I am fighting to get the exploits in the FC and housing system that are enabling them to take on more land than they rightfully should, and many of those are part of the hate club, that's why I gave you the honest answer of:

Because I wouldn't put it past members of the hate club to do this.

Again, I'm not actually accusing you of anything (you're doing that yourself quite well at this point), and we proceed to go through the entire thing where you think I have accused you of something when it's pretty clear you aren't actually reading what's being written.

And the great irony of this:

That's one hell of an ego you have there, to assume I hate you. My energies are best expended elsewhere.

If that were true, why did you feel the need to go on attack mode over a complete non-issue?

Methinks thou dost project too much....