Part of me likes most of it, but I was a little turned off when I found out the extra content that FF1 and FF2 had from PSP got was removed.
BUT
At the same time I acknowledge this a remaster of the original versions (not the remakes on Playstation Portable), and the original pixel artist from long ago is involved in this project.
I guess in a sense its like remastering the original anime from the 1980s just to bring it up to speed for the modern day fandom, and the remakes are just a re-telling? Not sure if that is the best analogy to use here.
FF3 I think out of all them so far is the best because it never came to America before (the original version at least). I read there is some mechanical differences besides the graphics with this version too.
Concerning the rest coming soon..I don't know how I will feel about FF4 and FF5 because again knowing they're going to cut out the extras. I didn't care for the extras on FF6 since the GBA version was kind of inferior and wasn't worth sitting through compared to the SNES/PS1 versions.
So likely I may end up buying FF3 and FF6 for consoles if it ever does come for consoles at all.
Some kind of express concern when Locke Cole was revealed that he lost that gritty look to his sprite, and the rest might end up following through. Its kind of a bummer because FF6's theme was a bit more on the darker side of Final Fantasy, even their monster designs reflected that too which are some of the best from FF.
In the end I really wish they didn't remove all the extra content, Square Enix seems like it is always taking two steps forward and one step back in almost all of their projects. I really don't understand why they make such decisions like they do.
Regardless I guess I will give those versions a chance (maybe). It is different enough to warrant another playthrough for me, and usually I don't like playing the same title back to back if it was recent playthrough from another version (I do make exceptions though).