Free Company Housing Census - July 2021

[Big_Bap]

FC housing reports for July 2021 (working on a report to compare data from July 2020 and July 2021)

Missing data: 0.02% (60/320,628)

Main report

Available Breakdowns:

• Free Company Houses
• Foundation (Year)
• Rank (Groups)
• Grand Company
• Members (Groups)
• Members (Total)
• Members (Average)

Available Views:

• Server
• Data Center
• Region

----------

FC Housing - Solo

Available Breakdowns:

• Free Company Houses (Solo)
• Foundation (Year)
• Rank (Groups)
• Grand Company

Available Views:

• Server
• Data Center
• Region

----------

FC Housing - ≤ 4 Members

Available Breakdowns:

• Free Company Houses (Solo)
• Foundation (Year)
• Rank (Groups)
• Grand Company
• Members (Groups)

Available Views:

• Server
• Data Center
• Region

----------

FC Housing - Plot Distribution

Available Breakdowns:

• Region
• Data Center
• Sizes
• Area
• Foundation (Year)
• Rank (Groups)
• Grand Company
• Members (Groups)
• Members (Total)
• Members (Average)

Available Views:

• Default

----------

FC Housing - Ward Distribution:

Available Breakdowns

• Region
• Data Center
• Sizes
• Area
• Foundation (Year)
• Rank (Groups)
• Grand Company
• Members (Groups)
• Members (Total)
• Members (Average)

Available Views:

• Default

[Canadane]

It's kind of concerning how many shell FCs exist.

[Big_Bap]

It's kind of concerning how many shell FCs exist.

Wanna know what's even more concerning?

How personal housing accounts for 70% of the houses on the North American/European Data Centers despite being inherently inferior while also failing to accommodate nearly as many players as FC housing.

[Almagnus1]

Wanna know what's even more concerning?

How personal housing accounts for 70% of the houses on the North American/European Data Centers despite being inherently inferior while also failing to accommodate nearly as many players as FC housing.

You want to know what's more concerning?

That people keep trying to grind personal housing to a halt when the truth is that more personal housing is the solution to the housing problem all because they could make far more with their shell FC sales.

[Big_Bap]

You want to know what's more concerning?

That people keep trying to grind personal housing to a halt when the truth is that more personal housing is the solution to the housing problem all because they could make far more with their shell FC sales.

Wake me up when you start making sense. If ever.

[Almagnus1]

Wake me up when you start making sense. If ever.

You awake yet? I've been making sense for a long time - it's not my fault if you're in FC housing dreamland.

[Besame]

You want to know what's more concerning?

That you been on this witch hunt for nearly 5 years on the forum and you still whine like a little baby. Every time SE takes some sort of action you always gotta move your goal posts so you can keep kickin' your feet like a spoiled little brat about something.

> Like that time you suggested SE should autodisband FC's with 4 members or less. (By the way, so many user have asked you what gives you the right to determine that FC's are only 'active' if they got more than 4 people. You never once answered because you dont have an answer. You run tail between legs every time like a whimp.)

> Like that time you suggested placards should have timers (and got your wish) so now everyone can sit there clicking their arm off.

> Like that time you suggested apartments should have rent and taxation now.

> Like that time you suggested lotteries and raffles (for the 83902nd time).

> Like that time you launched your war against multi-house owners because you were convinced they were holding all the houses on all servers hostage (despite data showing it to be untrue).

Like every damn time when you post about anything.

You and your literally garbage ideas hurt more people than it benefits. And every time SE actually implements one of them, then you come right back to the forums all OH NO I DIDN'T KNO IT WAS GUNNA DO THAT. And then you gotta shift your goalposts yet again so you can avoid being wrong for the nth time. Everytime someone questions you and corners you, you default right back to "WELL SE SHOULD ADD MORE HOUSES DURRR". It's time to quit now.

Buddy you got zero credibility and your suggestions and opinions are nothing short of worthless. Day in day out you scream the same dirt because you're just this bitter little manchild who wants to be some hero to housing no matter the cost. Hell someone even made a website with data and you still wanna make up these insane theories about how the universe revolves around you.

Everyone in the housing forum should know who to thank for all the upcoming changes to make their lives more miserable. The ones who own multiple houses are not the most toxic people. The most toxic one is actually you pal.

100x upvotes for the Pew

[Nepentha]

I knew it is just matter of time someone is going to organize a summary on Almangus1's ridiculous crusade on this forum and now here we go

Like I said, it's their tilting at windmills crusade that's just making housing worse for all of us.

We're all collateral damage in their war on the 1%.

[Themarvin]

SE can fix that, and make an update to what is needed of active people in and FC or the plot will explode.

They did that when they upped the Mentor system for an instance, upping the requirements for FC's a s in terms of active users or accounts in an FC could be an easy set fixed script solution... if you got the minimum amount of people needed for an FC.. then if one of them is inactive for 30 days or something... in that way you will get the auto-demolition note going, and you would need to find an active player to join that FC, to keep it at the minimum border, and on top of that, actually have these players enter the FC house now and then to keep it or reset the timer, if they get back to game.

Also the shell FCs will cease to exist, and/or be harder to maintain.

[Canadane]

Hopefully this time around they keep it in the housing forums and don't follow me elsewhere.

You can edit a post to have an increased post limit.
And you wouldn't lose context in your quote.