STOP Genderlocking Cosmetics!!

[Roukiz]

I've read through most of this thread and haven't seen any such comments. If they've been deleted beforehand then you're right, but if they've been deleted it also makes your statement on the first page and the comment I replied to seem like you're just lashing out to anyone that disagrees with you since there's no evidence to the contrary.

I mean, if that's what you consider "lashing out".

I don't see why I should have to catalogue every or any receipt of brazen verbal abuse on this forum, in order to validate my expression of dismay at what I've seen or experienced. I think your response speaks volumes.

And the comment you replied to was correcting someone's distorted perspective that I was somehow extorting and cowing the developers themselves by said dismay e.t.c

Dw sis, I see you

[Joven]

I mean, if that's what you consider "lashing out".

I don't see why I should have to catalogue every or any receipt of brazen verbal abuse on this forum, in order to validate my expression of dismay at what I've seen or experienced. I think your response speaks volumes.

And the comment you replied to was correcting someone's distorted perspective that I was somehow extorting and cowing the developers themselves by said dismay e.t.c

Dw sis, I see you

Claiming that people are "homophobic/transphobic" is a very serious accusation, so if you were using against those who were just disagreeing with you then, yes, that would be lashing out. What's more, using those terms willy-nilly devalues their importance.

You only see what you want to see and again, I'm a dude.

[Roukiz]

Claiming that people are "homophobic/transphobic" is a very serious accusation, so if you were using against those who were just disagreeing with you then, yes, that would be lashing out. What's more, using those terms willy-nilly devalues their importance.

You only see what you want to see and again, I'm a dude.

But you understand that my comments were in response to seeing actual homophobic/transphobic and generally hateful comments, right?
I fail to see what hill you're trying to defend right now sis

[Amnmaat]

But you understand that my comments were in response to seeing actual homophobic/transphobic and generally hateful comments, right?
I fail to see what hill you're trying to defend right now sis

Any examples?

[Xhanth]

But you understand that my comments were in response to seeing actual homophobic/transphobic and generally hateful comments, right?
I fail to see what hill you're trying to defend right now sis

Isn't that a blatant misgender on your part after they specifically told you what they identify as, just because they disagree with you. hmm...

[Joven]

But you understand that my comments were in response to seeing actual homophobic/transphobic and generally hateful comments, right?
I fail to see what hill you're trying to defend right now sis

After said explanation then sure, it's understandable, but you need to be aware about how it looks to those who came after those comments are no longer available as reference.

I'm not defending any hill except the for the fact that I am indeed a dude and not your "sis".

[Roukiz]

After said explanation then sure, it's understandable, but you need to be aware about how it looks to those who came after those comments are no longer available as reference.

I'm not defending any hill except the for the fact that I am indeed a dude and not your "sis".

I'd like to believe people have enough intelligence to understand a topic like this would no doubt bring out the worst; that forum moderation exists, and be able differentiate simple disagreement with blatant hateful and disparaging comments. But this forum continues to prove otherwise.

And oh no! I didn't mean anything by it! I'm always amazed at the destabilization and sensitivity of g*mer dudes being called sis as a term of endearment. Yet, to look beyond the mirror...

[Joven]

I'd like to believe people have enough intelligence to understand a topic like this would no doubt bring out the worst; that forum moderation exists, and be able differentiate simple disagreement with blatant hateful and disparaging comments. But this forum continues to prove otherwise.

And oh no! I didn't mean anything by it! I'm always amazed at the destabilization and sensitivity of g*mer dudes being called sis as a term of endearment. Yet, to look beyond the mirror...

People understand that well enough, but lack of evidence is lack of evidence.

I'm not "sensitive" about you calling me "sis", but in my opinion the only time a person's gender is relevant online is dating sites or p*rn. If it must be brought up the very least you could do is get it right. Though that being said I could imagine the hissy fit a "gender nonconforming" person such as yourself would have if I had been referring to you as "sir" or "madam" throughout this entire discourse.