


I talked about culture, not morals. Scotts are proud to wear skirts btwWhere you're wrong is that you suppose I'm talking about "moral" matters when I'm exclusively talk about "beautiful" vs "ugly", "cool" vs "weird".
Do men clothes can be worn by women? Absolutly. That's unfair but men clothes on women, clothings can match but women clothes on men... the truth is that the reply, most of time, is an absolute no. Men don't "fill" women clothings.
Even considering one gender, all clothings don't match all people. I would never wear "gothic" or "bikers", I watch out if it is "sportwears" because not all cuts will match. Because it doesn't fit me. I've realized long ago that not everyone can wear everything. Some people, but they are rare, can look cool whatever they wear but most people don't have this chance.
I don't care about moral. It's not my angle.
im baby


If you talk about culture, you can't escape that as soon as it is necessary, cultures adapt the clothing cut to the body shape.
The traditionnal kimono does have some kind of dress for men, in Asia, some clothings are some kind of dress, BUT the cut for women and men is not the same.
It's pretty Occidental and contemporary to escape the question of beauty. Even Arts now are not about "beautiful" but about "concepts", "shock". I'm old fashioned, Art, for me, remains about beauty. Clothings are supposed to valorize the natural attributes, to valorize advantages, not to... express some kind of politic opinion. People shouldn't complain if the style they absolutly want makes them look weird, it is their problem, they are not victims.
EDIT : Rather than beauty, I should use "balance", that sounds more accurate.
Colors are a different matters... India is a fair example that colors are not related to gender. Regarding colors, western countries are... pretty sad (even for cars, people are used to buy blue, grey, black, white... monotonous)
PS : I don't like kilts
PS (2): They mostly hide hairy legs with high socks²
Last edited by Eldevern; 07-25-2021 at 09:24 PM.
Are you Scottish? I am. I live in Scotland.
They're not referred to as skirts - they're referred to as kilts and they're quite clearly designed to not be a skirt in the regular sense and are built to adhere to the male form in a way that is very different to how a skirt would be designed to look and fit on a woman.
The Romans used attire similar to kilts, too - but again, they were designed to accommodate the differences between men and women.



A kilt is a type of skirt, it specifically being a kilt does not make it any less of a skirt.Are you Scottish? I am. I live in Scotland.
They're not referred to as skirts - they're referred to as kilts and they're quite clearly designed to not be a skirt in the regular sense and are built to adhere to the male form in a way that is very different to how a skirt would be designed to look and fit on a woman.
The Romans used attire similar to kilts, too - but again, they were designed to accommodate the differences between men and women.
If fitting body types was what was worrying the devs enough to prevent them from removing the genderlock, there would be no horror such as the male au ra casual top (or jacket or w/e it's called), they'd care enough to make it look decent.
Some people just seem to be against unlocking some gear because in their culture, it's deemed ugly or ridiculous.
But in a different culture, it could be alright. As Wissp stated above, throughout history, men have been wearing skirted attires commonly enough.
im baby
Good luck going to Scotland and calling a kilt a skirt, or going to Dubai and calling a kandora a dress/bath robe.A kilt is a type of skirt, it specifically being a kilt does not make it any less of a skirt.
If fitting body types was what was worrying the devs enough to prevent them from removing the genderlock, there would be no horror such as the male au ra casual top (or jacket or w/e it's called), they'd care enough to make it look decent.
Some people just seem to be against unlocking some gear because in their culture, it's deemed ugly or ridiculous.
But in a different culture, it could be alright. As Wissp stated above, throughout history, men have been wearing skirted attires commonly enough.
Men weren't dressing up in skirts throughout history, generally speaking - and they most certainly weren't seen or portrayed as such.
It isn't even considered to be a popular pursuit even in the modern day and one has to wonder how much of the support for such things is legitimate and how much is coerced due to threat of punishment...
Personally, as a gay guy, I'd rather not see the direction of glamour dictated by niche pursuits.




In the grand scheme of design, Kilts and Skirts are literally the same thing. Probly the only real difference is the material they are made from, and a few trinkets. Otherwise, a Kilt is just a Skirt, you dont have to be Male to wear one, just like you dont have to be Female to wear a Skirt. Sure a Native to the culture might get offended, but they are and function the same....not like there is anything wrong with that.They're not referred to as skirts - they're referred to as kilts and they're quite clearly designed to not be a skirt in the regular sense and are built to adhere to the male form in a way that is very different to how a skirt would be designed to look and fit on a woman.
Instead of asking for "stop genderlocking", asking for kilts for males or more pants for females is a better idea imo. But i guess kilts are too manly lol
Yeah but at the same time, some skirts have a different design. So like you said it's close but you can't just pick a skirt change de size just to make male be able to wear it and call it a kilt after. The differences are all in the details, that's why ppl don't put kilts and skirts together. One example is that kilts have a specific lengh and shape, skirts have all kind of lenghs and shapes. That's why many ppl here are against removing genderlock, it will be copy and pasting a dress without changes outside of not being too small or too big.In the grand scheme of design, Kilts and Skirts are literally the same thing. Probly the only real difference is the material they are made from, and a few trinkets. Otherwise, a Kilt is just a Skirt, you dont have to be Male to wear one, just like you dont have to be Female to wear a Skirt. Sure a Native to the culture might get offended, but they are and function the same....not like there is anything wrong with that.
And asking for tons of outfits being unlocked when the developpers don't even have time to make 2 different options on 1 outfit for everyone feels off to me. If genderlock is here, it's not just for being anoying.
Last edited by Juzjuzz; 07-26-2021 at 12:24 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



