STOP Genderlocking Cosmetics!!

[Iscah]

"That's an amazing outfit! I wonder if I... oh. I see. The pants are from a scouting set, the gloves are from a fending set, the shoes are for casters, and the jacket is from an alchemist-specific artifact set? Well. Never mind then."

Sage should have gotten alchemist gear as its starting set. Not the dress and cape that has been healer gear three times over already.

[LisSquid]

Sage should have gotten alchemist gear as its starting set. Not the dress and cape that has been healer gear three times over already.

Couldn't help but thinking the Sage top was a piece of old gear I used in a SCH glam back in SB. Lo and behold that top really did already exist..

[Vasoka]

Am I serious about not wanting to see men in revealing dresses and pink feathers sticking out of their unmentionable areas? Dead serious. Most people don't either, hence the lock.

Not only does it look revolting, but also in ESO where it's possible it is used by random trolls to make ridiculous looking characters in which they run around and meme about "for the lulz".

[xxmiamorecadenza]

Am I serious about not wanting to see men in revealing dresses and pink feathers sticking out of their unmentionable areas? Dead serious. Most people don't either, hence the lock.

Not only does it look revolting, but also in ESO where it's possible it is used by random trolls to make ridiculous looking characters in which they run around and meme about "for the lulz".

???

You this mad about women wearing pants too or - ?

[Vasoka]

Big difference between women wearing unisex attires such as trousers and men wearing female specific dresses.

I am not "mad" even remotely, but it seems you are. I am really sorry if I triggered you, I didn't mean to offend you with my opinion, truly.







Wait. I actually don't quite care.

Do not "westernize" FF with such nonsense.

[xxmiamorecadenza]

Big difference between women wearing unisex attires such as trousers and men wearing female specific dresses.

I am not "mad" even remotely, but it seems you are. I am really sorry if I triggered you, I didn't mean to offend you with my opinion, truly.

How is there a big difference? Back in the day ‘trousers’ weren’t considered unisex at all. And your opinion doesn’t offend me - it’s just confusing and lowkey archaic.

[Theodric]

How is there a big difference? Back in the day ‘trousers’ weren’t considered unisex at all. And your opinion doesn’t offend me - it’s just confusing and lowkey archaic.

Back in what 'day', exactly? As in, what time period are we talking about? Furthermore, which country and culture are you referring to? One? Multiple?

[Theodric]

I think such is arguably a very different context, and well suited to both a casual and a professional environment.

I like looking at the male form, by virtue of being a guy who likes guys.

I don't want to look at the male form through the context of dresses, though. I want to do so through the lens of armour that is designed to show off the muscles of powerful fighters - as was done throughout history in show battles in coliseums and the like.

[Lauront]

Am I serious about not wanting to see men in revealing dresses and pink feathers sticking out of their unmentionable areas? Dead serious. Most people don't either, hence the lock.

Not only does it look revolting, but also in ESO where it's possible it is used by random trolls to make ridiculous looking characters in which they run around and meme about "for the lulz".

Couldn't agree more!