STOP Genderlocking Cosmetics!!

[Hazama999]

Was sad to see the leg gear (the tights) of the Thavnairian Bustier set being altered for males. They were changed to shorts. Granted, it wasn't too drastic a change, and I can simply just wear something else... but I thought we were fine with male characters wearing a bikini-style leg gear. Coeurl beach briefs are a thing.

I guess I should be grateful they at least didn't turn into blue jeans or something...

/shrug

[Raikai]

Was sad to see the leg gear (the tights) of the Thavnairian Bustier set being altered for males. They were changed to shorts. Granted, it wasn't too drastic a change, and I can simply just wear something else... but I thought we were fine with male characters wearing a bikini-style leg gear. Coeurl beach briefs are a thing.

I guess I should be grateful they at least didn't turn into blue jeans or something...

/shrug

Athough I really like the shorts better than the briefs, I'm surprised they changed that given the fact that the 2P leggings exist and they are even more scandalous, as they accentuate certain assets. Or the summer briefs are also just as skimpy too.

In a perfect world, we'd have both items separate to suit people's tastes.

[PickledToast]

[Caurcas]

Unisex stuff looks like drek 99% of the time. As does a man in a feminine clothing like a skirt. It's just not flattering. More masculine glams please.

[Lauront]

Seconded. It looks atrocious.

[JisKing98]

[DawnAskham]

What I'd like to see...

Less job/role restrictions for glam, if any (I could see some lore-specific sets staying job locked, but most 'role' sets should not be job locked). Just removing most of the restrictions would go a long way towards giving everyone more options for all jobs.

Stop adding sets that switch looks based on character gender (e.g. jacket item on male becomes dress on female), and instead add both as items usable by all, and provide a way for characters to access all existing looks that currently swap looks based on gender (e.g. access to the pants 'male' version of an item on female characters).

[GrizzlyTank]

What I'd like to see...

Less job/role restrictions for glam, if any (I could see some lore-specific sets staying job locked, but most 'role' sets should not be job locked). Just removing most of the restrictions would go a long way towards giving everyone more options for all jobs.

Nothing more fun than to see the devs themselves ignore their own glamour restrictions when designing npcs.

[Packetdancer]

Nothing more fun than to see the devs themselves ignore their own glamour restrictions when designing npcs.

"That's an amazing outfit! I wonder if I... oh. I see. The pants are from a scouting set, the gloves are from a fending set, the shoes are for casters, and the jacket is from an alchemist-specific artifact set? Well. Never mind then."