Quote Originally Posted by Ultaniku View Post
(Wishful thinking)They could always sell the mog station sets as individual pieces as well. The pieces that don’t necessarily make much sense being gender locked would not have to be gender locked(gloves, shoes)
Or stick to selling whole sets but just make the boots and gloves unisex, like the Expeditioner sets originally had those pieces unisex even though the tops and pants(es?) were gendered.

They already essentially have that approach with the Aymeric costume where the hairstyle is unisex even though the outfit isn't.

And in practice it's there for things like the Mheg Deaca where people might not touch the fairy gown with a barge pole but they want the circlet and boots. Or really, any time anyone buys a whole outfit just for one piece.


Quote Originally Posted by Roda View Post
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/R56J93/fashion-clothing-in-france-at-the-time-of-louis-xiv-from-left-king-louis-xiv-around-1660-illustration-france-R56J93.jpg
just guys being dudes
And that is why people with a mind for historical clothing see a lot less imbalance to feminine outfits here...


Quote Originally Posted by Allegor View Post
I kinda agree with them though, there are items that aren't necessarily gendered, but are still genderlocked because they're part of a set - Ryne's boots and Y'shtola's feather thingies as the most recent examples.
Another one that jumps to mind is Lyse's set – unique gloves, sabatons that exist as a player model already and, particularly, unique earrings that would need no adaptation work.

Also the ARR Scion sets which again all exist as player models. They're not really exciting outfits overall, of course, but would give a few currently role-locked pieces to use for all classes – getting the caligae models to equip on mages, for example.

Cid's goggles as well.