STOP Genderlocking Cosmetics!!

[Raikai]

For me, I honestly don't care what people are. I'm a girl and I wanted 9S outfit too.
I just think people should be able to wear whatever they please in my honest opinion. Peoples sexuality on the matter doesn't matter to me as they're just clothes.
Here's another example of something I want, the male version of this:

Shirt > Dress.

Word! Alternatively, I want the female version of those leggings, so I could fully realize a better jester outfit using the Evenstar coat!

But I agree that the waistcoat being available to girls is a really attractive prospect too.

[DawnAskham]

What I'd like to see...

Less job/role restrictions for glam, if any (I could see some lore-specific sets staying job locked, but most 'role' sets should not be job locked). Just removing most of the restrictions would go a long way towards giving everyone more options for all jobs.

Stop adding sets that switch looks based on character gender (e.g. jacket item on male becomes dress on female), and instead add both as items usable by all, and provide a way for characters to access all existing looks that currently swap looks based on gender (e.g. access to the pants 'male' version of an item on female characters).

[GrizzlyTank]

What I'd like to see...

Less job/role restrictions for glam, if any (I could see some lore-specific sets staying job locked, but most 'role' sets should not be job locked). Just removing most of the restrictions would go a long way towards giving everyone more options for all jobs.

Nothing more fun than to see the devs themselves ignore their own glamour restrictions when designing npcs.

[Packetdancer]

Nothing more fun than to see the devs themselves ignore their own glamour restrictions when designing npcs.

"That's an amazing outfit! I wonder if I... oh. I see. The pants are from a scouting set, the gloves are from a fending set, the shoes are for casters, and the jacket is from an alchemist-specific artifact set? Well. Never mind then."

[Iscah]

"That's an amazing outfit! I wonder if I... oh. I see. The pants are from a scouting set, the gloves are from a fending set, the shoes are for casters, and the jacket is from an alchemist-specific artifact set? Well. Never mind then."

Sage should have gotten alchemist gear as its starting set. Not the dress and cape that has been healer gear three times over already.

[LisSquid]

Sage should have gotten alchemist gear as its starting set. Not the dress and cape that has been healer gear three times over already.

Couldn't help but thinking the Sage top was a piece of old gear I used in a SCH glam back in SB. Lo and behold that top really did already exist..

[Iscah]

Couldn't help but thinking the Sage top was a piece of old gear I used in a SCH glam back in SB. Lo and behold that top really did already exist..

50+ job starter gear is always recycled. RDM is generic mage gear, SAM is the Asuran mage set, GNB is the Wrangler aiming set, DNC is Thavnairian glamour, RPR is the Void Ark striking coat and Woad boots.

Sage's boots and gloves are from the Midan aiming/scouting sets, but the rest was already healer gear.

The recycling is no surprise; it's the choice of outfit that's disappointing when there were better options.

(RDM also got dudded. Should have had the Orthodox DPS gear or the Thief coat.)