Shell FCs are a bigger problem than we think...

[MrMagic]

As for why I'm making the four member distinction, please go read https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes.../housing_land/ . That page lists a requirement of at least four members to buy an FC house, it should also require at least four members to keep the FC house. That also follows with how many people are required to create the FC in the first place (four total signatures). It's as if SE considers four the minimum number of people for an FC

It's as if SE considers 4 the minimum number to create a FC or buy a plot. You're the one that wants to change the requirements to maintaining at least 4 members at all times. I'm sure SE realises that a FC may lose a member before they grow and isn't looking be as over the top as you are, thankfully.

Why should the initial requirement and the maintenance requirement of member numbers be the same. Seems pointless to only buy a plot with a FC with 4 members if dropping 1 member means you all lose the house you worked towards. I'm genuinely fascinated you can't figure that out.

[Nepentha]

It's as if SE considers 4 the minimum number to create a FC or buy a plot. You're the one that wants to change the requirements to maintaining at least 4 members at all times. I'm sure SE realises that a FC may lose a member before they grow and isn't looking be as over the top as you are, thankfully.

Why should the initial requirement and the maintenance requirement of member numbers be the same. Seems pointless to only buy a plot with a FC with 4 members if dropping 1 member means you all lose the house you worked towards. I'm genuinely fascinated you can't figure that out.

Because the point isn't that they want to change things for the better. The point is they want to punish players they feel are committing wrongs. Seriously that is the only thing they fixate on in these forums. Finding a way to get to and force people who don't follow the rules in their head to give up their houses. If it means making the whole system untenable for the rest of the playerbase, so be it. We're all collateral damage in their war on the 1%.

[MrMagic]

Because the point isn't that they want to change things for the better. The point is they want to punish players they feel are committing wrongs. Seriously that is the only thing they fixate on in these forums. Finding a way to get to and force people who don't follow the rules in their head to give up their houses. If it means making the whole system untenable for the rest of the playerbase, so be it. We're all collateral damage in their war on the 1%.

At least they are consistent. Pushing for more Gil sinks, sure. Let’s throw in auto demolition as well to something that doesn’t need it for good measure. So out of touch.

[Besame]

Because the point isn't that they want to change things for the better. The point is they want to punish players they feel are committing wrongs. Seriously that is the only thing they fixate on in these forums. Finding a way to get to and force people who don't follow the rules in their head to give up their houses. If it means making the whole system untenable for the rest of the playerbase, so be it. We're all collateral damage in their war on the 1%.

It's the Democratic way right??? hehe